APHC010295052019 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3368] THURSDAY, THE FOURTH DAY OF SEPTEMBER TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE B V L N CHAKRAVARTHI WRIT PETITION NO: 13794/2019 Between: 1. YALAMANDALA RAMAKRISHNA RAO, S/O. MAHALAKSHMAIAH, AGED 57 YEARS, OCC- PRIVATE SERVICE, R/O. BALLEM VARI STREET, PRASADAMPADU, VIJAYAWADA CITY, KRISHNA DISTRICT. 2. YALARNANDALA KALESWARA RAO,, S/O. SEETHARAMAIAH, AGED 62 YEARS, OCC- CULTIVATION, RIO. PENUGANCHIPROLU VILLAGE AND MANDAL, KRISHNA DISTRICT. ...PETITIONER(S) AND 1. STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH, REP. BY ITS PRINCIPAL SECRETARY TO GOVERNMENT, HOME DEPARTMENT, SECRETARIAT, VELAGAPUDI, AMARAVATI, GUNTUR DISTRICT. 2. SUPERINTENDANT OF POLICE, KRISHNA DISTRICT AT MACHILIPATNAM. 3. STATE HOUSE OFFICER, PENUGANCHIPROLU POLICE STATION, KRISHNA DISTRICT. 4. SANKARA RAO, S/O. NOT KNOWN, WORKING AS ASSISTANT SUB-INSPECTOR OF POLICE, PENUGANCHIPROLU, KRISHNA DISTRICT. 2 5. GOPISETTI NAGA MALLESWARI, D/O. VENKATESWARA RAO, R/O. PENUGANCHIPROLU VILLAGE AND MANDAL, KRISLMA DISTRICT. ...RESPONDENT(S): Counsel for the Petitioner(S): 1. NIMMAGADDA REVATHI Counsel for the Respondent(S): 1. GP FOR HOME (AP) The Court made the following: 3 THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE B.V.L.N.CHAKRAVARTHI WRIT PETITION No.13794 OF 2019 ORDER: This Writ Petition is filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India for the following relief: “….to issue a writ, order or direction more particularly one in the nature of WRIT OF MANDAMUS declaring the action of respondents, particularly respondents 3 and 4, at the instance of 5th respondent, in repeatedly insisting the petitioners to appear before their authority and yield to the terms of 5th respondent in connection with civil disputes connected to agricultural landed property of Ac. 0.91 1/2 cents, Ac. 0.04 1/2 cents and Ac. 0.06 cents respectively covered by Re. Survey Number 696/10B, 696/9B and 696/9A all together Ac. 1.02 cents of Penuganchiprolu Revenue Village and Mandal, Krishna District, as illegal, irregular, irrational, arbitrary, without any authority of law and violative of Articles 14 and 21 of the Constitution of India and consequently direct the respondents rot to interfere in any manner with the petitioners' life, liberty and said properties and pass…” 2. None appeared for the petitioners. 3. Learned Assistant Government Pleader for Home on written instructions would submit that the respondents did not call the petitioners as alleged in the writ petition. Their preliminary enquiry would reveal that civil suits are pending before the Civil Court, and it is a matter relating to civil dispute, and therefore, they will not interfere in this matter in accordance with law. 4 4. The allegations of the writ petitioners are that police are interfering in civil dispute without following due procedure established by law. 5. In the light of submissions made by the learned Assistant Government Pleader for Home on written instructions, it would clear that the matter is of civil in nature, and police will not interfere in such matters. 6. In that view of the matter, nothing remains for further adjudication in the writ petition, and the writ petition is liable to be dismissed as infructuous, at the stage of admission, without going to merits of the case. 7. Accordingly, the Writ Petition is dismissed as infructuous. There shall be no order as to costs. As a sequel thereto, interlocutory applications, if any, pending in this Writ Petition shall stand closed. ______________________________ JUSTICE B.V.L.N. CHAKRAVARTHI 04.09.2025 Pmk 5 32 THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE B.V.L.N. CHAKRAVARTHI WRIT PETITION No:13794 OF 2019 Date: 04.09.2025 Pmk