Research › Search › Judgment

Bombay High Court · body

2025 DAILYLAW 20934 (BOM)

HANUMANT BAJIRAO MANE AND ANR v. SHUBHANGI ASHOK CHINTAMANI AND ORS

CA/8811/2024 · 2025-04-15

Shri S G Chapalgaonkar

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

(1) 124-ca-8811-2024-delay.odt IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY BENCH AT AURANGABAD CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 8811 OF 2024 IN FAST/17465/2024 HANUMANT BAJIRAO MANE AND ANR VERSUS SHUBHANGI ASHOK CHINTAMANI AND ORS ... Mr. Amol Subhash Gandhi, Advocate for Applicants. Mr. V. S. Wakale, Advocate for Respondent Nos.1 to 3. ... CORAM : S. G. CHAPALGAONKAR, J. DATED : 15th APRIL, 2025. P.C.:- 1. Heard learned Advocate appearing for respective parties. 2. By this application, applicants seek to condone delay of 15 days caused in filing Appeal. 3. Perused application and reasons as stated therein. Sufficient cause is made out to condone delay. Hence, following order: ORDER a. Civil Application is allowed. b. Delay of 15 days caused in filing appeal is hereby condoned. c. Appeal be registered. (S. G. CHAPALGAONKAR) JUDGE Devendra/April-2025 2025:BHC-AUG:10864