VIKRAM SINGH SON OF SHRI ROOPRAM v. STATE OF RAJASTHAN
CW/9677/2019 · 2025-01-08
Sudesh Bansal
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 20933 (RAJ) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 20933 (RAJ) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
[2025:RJ-JP:1200] HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. Civil Writ Petition No. 9677/2019
1. Vikram Singh Son Of Shri Roopram, Aged About 39 Years, Resident Of Village Charda, Post Harsoli, Tehsil Kotkasim, District Alwar, Rajasthan.
2. Madhubala Wife Of Shri Om Prakash, Aged About 46 Years, Resident Of Road No. 2, Khadana Mohalla, Alwar, Rajasthan. ----Petitioners Versus
1. State Of Rajasthan, Through Principle Secretary Department Of Local Self Government, Secretariat, Jaipur.
2. Director Local Self Government Department, Government Of Rajasthan, G-3, Rajmahal Residential Area, C-Scheme, Near Civil Lines Phatak, Jaipur 16 Rajasthan.
3. Nagar Parishad Alwar, Through Its Commissioner, Nagar Parishad, Alwar, Rajasthan.
4. Director, T And M Services Consulting Pvt. Ltd., T And M House, Kohinoor Complex, A Wing, Next To Maharaja Hotel, Dahisar, Mumbai. ----Respondents For Petitioner(s) : Ms. Apoorva Jain for Mr. Himanshu Jain For Respondent(s) :
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SUDESH BANSAL Order 08/01/2025
1. Counsel for petitioners, having instructions of petitioners, states that with passage of time, relief prayed for in the instant writ petition, in respect of challenging the impugned orders dated 10.04.2019 and 11.04.2019, has rendered infructuous, hence petitioners do not want to press this writ petition.
2. In view of above, the present writ petition is dismissed as not press.
3. All pending application(s), if any, stand(s) disposed of.
(SUDESH BANSAL),J Sachin/84