Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Karnataka · body

2025 DAILYLAW 20931 (KAR)

SRI A S HULI GOWDA v. SMT A S LAXMAMMA

RFA/1425/2023 · 2025-01-08

Jyoti Mulimani

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

- 1 - NC: 2025:KHC:650 RFA No. 1425 of 2023 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 8TH DAY OF JANUARY, 2025 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE JYOTI MULIMANI REGULAR FIRST APPEAL NO. 1425 OF 2023 (PAR) BETWEEN: 1. SRI A.S.HULI GOWDA S/O LATE SIDDE GOWDA, AGED ABOUT 58 YEARS, 2. SRI.A.S.LAKKE GOWDA S/O LATE SIDDE GOWDA, AGED ABOUT 56 YEARS, 3. SRI.A.S.RAMESHA S/O LATE SIDDE GOWDA, AGED ABOUT 46 YEARS, 4. SMT.A.S.GOWRAMMA W/O CHIKKEGOWDA, AGED ABOUT 56 YEARS, PETITIONER NO.S 1 TO 4 ARE R/AT AMBLE VILLAGE, AMBLE POST AND HOBLI, CHIMANGALUR TALUK & DISTRICT, CHIKMANGALAURU-577 101. 5. SMT.A.S.NINGAMMA W/O REVANNA, D/O LATE SIDDEGOWDA, AGED ABOUT 48 YEARS, R/O HULIKERE VILLAGE, SAKHARAYAPATTANA HOBLI, KADUR TALUK, CHICKMAGALUR DISTRICT, CHIKMAGALURU-577 101. Digitally signed by PREMCHANDRA M R Location: High Court of Karnataka - 2 - NC: 2025:KHC:650 RFA No. 1425 of 2023 6. SMT.A.S.GANGAMMA W/O MALLESHGOWDA, D/O LATE SIDDEGOWDA, AGED ABOUT 52 YEARS, R/O MADABALU VILLAGE, HASSAN TALUK AND DISTRICT. …APPELLANTS (BY SMT. HEMALATHA., ADVOCATEFOR SRI. B.R.SRINIVASA., ADVOCATE) AND: 1. SMT A.S.LAXMAMMA W/O NINGEGOWDA, D/O LATE SIDDEGOWDA, AGED ABOUT 39 YEARS, R/O GOWDANAHALLI, AMBLE POST AND HOBLI, CHIKMAGALUR TALUK AND DISTRICT, CHIKMAGALURU-577 101. 2. SMT.A.S.BHAGYA W/O NAGEGOWDE, D/O LATE SIDDEGOWDA, AGED ABOUT 37 YEARS, RESIDENT OF CHIKKAGOUJA, HIREGOUJA POST, CHICKMAGALURU TALUK AND DISTRICT, CHIKMAGALURU-577 101. 3. SMT.A.S.GOWRAMMA WIFE OF LOKESH, D/O LATE SIDDEGOWDA, AGED ABOUT 35 YEARS, RESIDENT OF CHIKKAGOUJA, HIREGOUJA POST, CHICKMAGALURU TALUK, CHIKMAGALURU-577 101. 4. SMT.A.S.VEDHA D/O LATE SIDDEGOWDA, AGED ABOUT 33 YEARS, - 3 - NC: 2025:KHC:650 RFA No. 1425 of 2023 5. SRI.A.S.HONNEGOWDA S/O LATE SIDDEGOWDA, AGED ABOUT 27 YEARS, RESPONDENT NO.S 4 & 5 ARE R/AT AMBLE VILLAGE, AMBLE POST AND HOBLI, CHIKMANGALUR TALUK AND DISTRICT, CHIKMAGALURU-577 101. …RESPONDENTS THIS REGULAR FIRST APPEAL IS FILED UNDER SECTION 96 OF THE CPC, 1908. THIS REGULAR FIRST APPEAL IS LISTED FOR ORDERS, THIS DAY, AN ORDER IS MADE AS UNDER: ORAL ORDER Smt.Hemalatha.B.V., counsel on behalf of Sri.B.R.Srinivasa Gowda., for the appellants has appeared in person. Counsel for the appellants submits that the appeal may be dismissed as withdrawn. When queried, counsel Smt.Hemalatha.B.V., submits that a conscious decision is taken by the advocate on record and the appellants to withdraw the appeal and if an order is passed, they shall not seek for recalling the order and will not file the Review Petition. - 4 - NC: 2025:KHC:650 RFA No. 1425 of 2023 The oral submission made by counsel for the appellants is placed on record. The Regular First Appeal is dismissed as withdrawn. Sd/- (JYOTI MULIMANI) JUDGE MRP List No.: 2 Sl No.: 16