DR AJAY SINGH SON OF LATE SHRI SHERSINGH JI CHITTORA v. AJAY PAL SINGH RATHORE SON OF SHRI KARNI SINGH RATHORE
CW/8774/2025 · 2025-05-30
Anoop Kumar Dhand
Criminal Appealbody2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 20928 (RAJ) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 20928 (RAJ) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
[2025:RJ-JP:22686] HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. Civil Writ Petition No. 8774/2025 Dr Ajay Singh Son Of Late Shri Shersingh Ji Chittora, Aged About 68 Years, Resident Of Plot No. E-24/a-1 Durga Marg, Banipark, Jaipur- 302016 ----Petitioner Versus Ajay Pal Singh Rathore Son Of Shri Karni Singh Rathore, Aged About 39 Years, Resident Of 52 Vijay Nagar, Scheme Malviya Nagar, Jaipur (Rajasthan) At Present Chak 19 Hmh, There Gangani P.o. Ramsar Narayan, Hanumangarh, District Hanumangarh. ----Respondent For Petitioner(s) : Mr.Rishi Kumar Sharma JUSTICE ANOOP KUMAR DHAND
Order 30/05/2025
1. By way of filing this writ petition, a limited prayer has been made by counsel for the petitioner for issuing direction to the Rent Tribunal No.2, Jaipur Metropolitan-I for expeditious disposal of the application submitted by the petitioner under Section 22(C) of the Rajasthan Rent Tribunal Act, 2001 (for short, “the Act of 2001”) within time frame.
2.
Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner is a senior citizen of age 68 years, therefore, appropriate direction be issued for expeditious disposal of the aforesaid application within the time frame.
3. Heard and considered the submissions made at the Bar and perused the material available on the record.
[2025:RJ-JP:22686] (2 of 2) [CW-8774/2025]
4. The Hon’ble Apex Court in the case of High Court Bar Association, Allahabad vs. State of Uttar Pradesh, while deciding the Criminal Appeal No.3589/2023 has deprecated the practice of the Courts of issuing directions to the subordinate Courts to decide the matter in a timeline.
5. The aforesaid directions cannot be issued by this Court. But looking to the fact that the petitioner is a senior citizens of the age of 68 years, it is expected from the Rent Tribunal to make all possible endeavours to decide the eviction application expeditiously as early as possible.
6. With the aforesaid observations/directions, the instant writ petition stands disposed of. The stay application and all pending applications, if any, also stand disposed of.
(ANOOP KUMAR DHAND),J Aayush Sharma /376