Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Jharkhand · body

2025 DAILYLAW 20926 (JHR)

NIMAI CHANDRA DEY v. STATE OF JHARKHAND

Cont.(Cvl)/710/2024 · 2025-01-14

S N Pathak

Contempt Petitionbody2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI Cont. Case (C) No. 710 of 2024 ---------- 1.Nimia Chandra Dey 2.Prabin Kumar Kuilia ………… Petitioners Versus 1.The State of Jharkhand 2.Rahul Kumar Purwar, IAS, father’s name not known to the petitioners, Secretary, Department of Human Resource and Development, Govt. of Jharkhand, Project Building, Ranchi 3.Sri Ananya Mittal, father’s name not known to the petitioners at present posted as Deputy Commissioner cum Chairman, District Establishment Committee, East Singhbhum, Jamshedpur, Dist. Singhbhum East, Jharkhand 4.Mr. Ashish Kumar Pandey, father’s name not known to the petitioners, at present posted as District Superintendent of Education cum Member Secretary, District Establishment Committee, Jamshedpur, Singhbhum East, Dist.-Singhbhum East. ………… Opp. Parties ------- CORAM: HON'BLE DR. JUSTICE S.N.PATHAK For the Petitioners : Mr. Prabhash Kumar, Advocate Mr. Ganesh Ram, Advocate For the O.Ps. : Mr. Ashok Kr. Singh, AC to SC (L&C)-III ---------- 05/ 14.01.2025 Learned counsel for the opposite parties submits that the order of this Court has already been complied with. 2. In view of fair submission of learned counsel for the opposite parties, no contempt is made out against the opposite parties and hence, the same is dropped. 3. Resultantly, the instant contempt petition stands disposed of. 4. Petitioners are at liberty to challenge the reasoned order, if aggrieved. (Dr. S.N. Pathak, J.) Rohit/-