- 1 - NC: 2025:KHC:11922 WP No. 8032 of 2025 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 21ST DAY OF MARCH, 2025 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE N S SANJAY GOWDA WRIT PETITION NO. 8032 OF 2025 (KLR-RES) BETWEEN: 1. SRI HANUMANTHARAYAPPA S/O. HANUMAIHA, AGED ABOUT 70 YEARS, R/AT BANDIKODIGEHALLI VILLAGE, JALA HOBLI, YALAHANKA TALUK. BANGALORE URBAN DISTRICT -562149 …PETITIONER (BY SRI. H.C.ANANDA., ADVOCATE) AND: 1. THE STATE OF KARNATAKA REP. BY ITS PRINCIPAL SECRETARY, REVENUE DEPARTMENT, MS BUILDING, AMBEDKAR VEEDI, BENGALURU-56001. 2. THE TAHASILDAR, YALAHANKA TALUK, YALAHANKA-560064 3. THE REVENUE INSPECTOR, BAGALUR CIRCLE, BAGALUR NADAKACHERI, BAGALUR VILLAGE, JALA HOBLI, YALAHNAKA TALUK-562149 4. THE VILLAGE ACCOUNTANT BANDIKODIGEHALLI CIRCLE, AT NADAKACHERI BAGALUR BAGLUR VILLAGE, JALA HOBLI, YALAHANKA TALUK-562149 …RESPONDENTS (BY SRI. K.MANJUNATH., HCGP) Digitally signed by KIRAN KUMAR R Location: HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA - 2 - NC: 2025:KHC:11922 WP No. 8032 of 2025 THIS WP IS FILED UNDER ARTICLES 226 AND 227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA, PRAYING TO ISSUE A WRIT OF PROHIBITION, PROHIBITING THE R-2 TO 4 FROM INTERFERING OR DISPOSSESSING THE PETITIONER FROM THE SCHEDULE PROPERTY, ETC. THIS PETITION, COMING ON FOR PRELIMINARY HEARING, THIS DAY, ORDER WAS MADE THEREIN AS UNDER: CORAM: HON'BLE MR JUSTICE N S SANJAY GOWDA ORAL ORDER 1. The petitioner has filed this petition seeking for a direction to respondent No.2 to enter his name in the computerized RTC. 2. The petitioner is also seeking for a writ of prohibition to restrain the respondents from interfering or dispossessing the petitioner from the property in question. 3. It is noticed that the petitioner has, in fact, preferred an appeal to the Assistant Commissioner in the R.A.(YLK) No.689/2024 seeking for the very same relief. 4. In my view, in the light of the fact that the petitioner is before the Assistant Commissioner, the - 3 - NC: 2025:KHC:11922 WP No. 8032 of 2025 appropriate Forum to pursue the said appeal and entertaining of this Writ Petition would be unnecessary. The Writ Petition is, therefore, dismissed. 5. Petitioner is reserved liberty to pursue the appeal that he has filed before the Assistant Commissioner in R.A.(YLK) No.689/2024 and the petitioner is also at liberty to seek for any interim relief that he thinks necessary before the Assistant Commissioner. 6. It is also open for the petitioner to avail of any remedy available to him including approaching of the Civil Court. 7. In view of the disposal of the petition, all pending interlocutory applications, if any, stand disposed of. Sd/- (N S SANJAY GOWDA) JUDGE HNM, List No.: 1 Sl No.: 45