[2025:RJ-JP:16910] HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. Civil Miscellaneous Appeal No. 2295/2018 Satyanarayan Agarwal ----Appellant Versus Union Of India Thr Gen Manager And Anr ----Respondent For Appellant(s) : Mr. Vishnu Kumar For Respondent(s) : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE GANESH RAM MEENA Order 22/04/2025 1. This appeal has been preferred on 26.04.2018 with a challenge to judgment dated 25.09.2017 passed by the Addl. District Judge No. 6, Jaipur Metropolitan, whereby the objection/application was dismissed. 2. The appeal has been filed by the delay of 94 days and application for condonation of delay has also been field. 3. Learned counsel for the appellant submits that after passing of the impugned judgment, the appellant fell ill and he could not contact the counsel for filing the appeal. He further submits that the delay in filing the appeal is neither malafide nor deliberate. 4. Considered the submissions and also perused the averments made in the application for condonation of delay. 5. The appellant has only stated that after passing of the impugned judgment he fell ill and could not contact the counsel for fling the appeal. Nothing has been disclosed in the application that what was the illness and for how much period he remained ill. [2025:RJ-JP:16910] (2 of 2) [CMA-2295/2018] No any document related to illness or treatment has been placed on record. 6. While considering the application for condonation of delay, Court has to see whether the explanation submitted by the appellant is justified. In the present case, the explanation submitted by the appellant is without any documentary proof which cannot be said to be satisfactory. Accordingly, the Court finds no ground to condone the delay in filing the appeal. 7. As a result, the application for condonation of delay is dismissed. 8. Since the application for condonation of delay is dismissed, the appeal is time barred and the same is also dismissed. (GANESH RAM MEENA),J GAURAV SRIVASTAVA /27