MOLLI APPALARAJU v. THE GREATER VISAKHAPATNAM MUNICIPAL CORPORATION
WP/14814/2024 · 2025-08-05
Harinath N
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 20921 (AP) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 20921 (AP) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
APHC010294692024
IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH (Special Original Jurisdiction) WEDNESDAY,THE SIXTH DAY OF AUGUST TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE HARINATH.N WRIT PETITION NO: 14814/2024 Between:
1. MOLLI APPALARAJU, S/O. RAMU NAIDU, AGED 62 YEARS, R/O.D.NO.12-451/02, ARILOVA SECTOR VISAKHAPATNAM DISTRICT. 2. MOLLI JAGGA RAO,, S/O. RAMU NAIDU, AGED 58 YEARS, R/O.D.NO.12-451/02, ARILOVA SECTOR VISAKHAPATNAM DISTRICT. 3. LATE MOLLI APPARAO,, S/O.KANNAYYA, REPRESENTED BY HIS WIFE SMT. PYDITHALLI, AGED 74 YEARS R/O.THOTAGARUVU, ARILOVA SECTOR-1 DAIRY FARM (POST), VISAKHAPATNAM DISTRICT. 4. MOLLI APPALANARASAMMA, , AGED 70 YEARS, W/O. RAMANAMMA,
R/O.D.NO.8 SECTOR-1, DAIRY FARM (POST), VISAKHAPATNAM DISTRICT. 5. MOLLI APPALARAJU,, S/O. VENKAPPA, AGED 58 YEARS, R/O.D.NO.8-1/1 THOTAGARUVU, ARILOVA SECTOR FARM (POST), VISAKHAPATNAM DISTRICT. 1. THE GREATER VISAKHAPATNAM MUNICIPAL CORPORATION, VISAKHAPATNAM REPRESENTED BY ITS COMMISSIONER, G.V.M.C.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) WEDNESDAY,THE SIXTH DAY OF AUGUST TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE HARINATH.N WRIT PETITION NO: 14814/2024 MOLLI APPALARAJU, S/O. RAMU NAIDU, AGED 62 YEARS, 451/02, ARILOVA SECTOR-I, DAIRY FARM (POST), VISAKHAPATNAM DISTRICT. MOLLI JAGGA RAO,, S/O. RAMU NAIDU, AGED 58 YEARS, 451/02, ARILOVA SECTOR-1, DAIRY FARM VISAKHAPATNAM DISTRICT. LATE MOLLI APPARAO,, S/O.KANNAYYA, REPRESENTED BY HIS WIFE SMT. PYDITHALLI, AGED 74 YEARS R/O.THOTAGARUVU, 1 DAIRY FARM (POST), VISAKHAPATNAM MOLLI APPALANARASAMMA, , AGED 70 YEARS, W/O. RAMANAMMA,
R/O.D.NO.8-1/1 THOTAGARUVU, ARILOVA 1, DAIRY FARM (POST), VISAKHAPATNAM DISTRICT. MOLLI APPALARAJU,, S/O. VENKAPPA, AGED 58 YEARS, 1/1 THOTAGARUVU, ARILOVA SECTOR-1, DAIRY FARM (POST), VISAKHAPATNAM DISTRICT. ...PETITIONER(S) AND THE GREATER VISAKHAPATNAM MUNICIPAL CORPORATION, VISAKHAPATNAM REPRESENTED BY ITS COMMISSIONER, IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH [3457] MOLLI APPALARAJU, S/O. RAMU NAIDU, AGED 62 YEARS, I, DAIRY FARM (POST), MOLLI JAGGA RAO,, S/O. RAMU NAIDU, AGED 58 YEARS, 1, DAIRY FARM (POST), LATE MOLLI APPARAO,, S/O.KANNAYYA, REPRESENTED BY HIS WIFE SMT. PYDITHALLI, AGED 74 YEARS R/O.THOTAGARUVU, 1 DAIRY FARM (POST), VISAKHAPATNAM MOLLI APPALANARASAMMA, , AGED 70 YEARS, W/O. LATE 1/1 THOTAGARUVU, ARILOVA 1, DAIRY FARM (POST), VISAKHAPATNAM DISTRICT. MOLLI APPALARAJU,, S/O. VENKAPPA, AGED 58 YEARS, 1, DAIRY PETITIONER(S) THE GREATER VISAKHAPATNAM MUNICIPAL CORPORATION, VISAKHAPATNAM REPRESENTED BY ITS COMMISSIONER,
2
2. THE GOVERNMENT OF ANDHRA PRADESH MUNICIPAL ADMINISTRATION AND URBAN DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY, REPRESENTED BY ITS SPECIAL CHIEF SECRETARY TO GOVERNMENT. ...RESPONDENT(S): Counsel for the Petitioner(S):
1. B.UMA MAHESWARA RAO Counsel for the Respondent(S):
1. K.MADHAVA REDDY (SC FOR GVMC)
2.
GP MUNCIPAL ADMN AND URBAN DEV AP The Court made the following:
3
ORDER:-
The learned counsel for the petitioners submits that the petitioners are aggrieved by the inaction on the part of the respondents in disposing of the representations of the petitioners submitted by the petitioners seeking allotment of alternate house sites for the land which was acquired for the purpose of BRTS Road and that the petitioners were displaced by the said acquisition. In that regard, the petitioners submitted representations to the 1st respondent seeking alternate house sites, however, the representations have so far not been considered nor any reply furnished. 2. Heard the learned counsel for the petitioners and the learned Standing Counsel for the 1st respondent. 3. In view of the same, the petitioners shall submit fresh representations together with the title documents and proof of possession of the property as on the date of acquisition, and on receipt of such representations, the 1st respondent shall duly consider the same in accordance with law and pass a speaking order, forwarding a copy of the said order to the petitioners as well. 4. Accordingly, this writ petition is disposed off. There shall be no order as to costs. As a sequel, miscellaneous petitions pending, if any, shall stand closed. ___________________ JUSTICE HARINATH.N 06.08.2025 PNS
4