Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Jharkhand · body

2025 DAILYLAW 20918 (JHR)

M/S KVR OPTICAL INDUSTRIES v. JHARKHAND STATE ELECTRICITY BO

WPC/5100/2008 · 2025-07-31

Anil Kumar Choudhary

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

( 2021:JHHC:39939 ) IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI W.P. (C). No.5100 of 2008 ------ M/s. KVR Optical Industries, a proprietorship firm having its works at A-9, Industrial Estate, Adityapur, P.O. and P.S.-Adityapur, District-Seraikella-Kharsawan, through its Proprietor Virendra Jha, son of Late Devendra Jha, resident of A-9 Industrial Estate, Adityapur, P.O. & P.S.-Adityapur, District-Seraikella-Kharsawan. .... .... …. Petitioner Versus 1. Jharkhand State Electricity Board through its Chairman, Kusai Colony, Doranda, P.O. & P.S.-Doranda, District-Ranchi. 2. General Manager-cum-Chief Engineer, Jharkhand State Electricity Board, Jamshedpur, District-East Singhbhum. 3. Electrical Executive Engineer, Jharkhand State Electricity Board, Adityapur, P.O. & P.S.-Adityapur, District-Seraikella-Kharsawan. 4. Sri I.D. Yadav, s/o not known the petitioner, R/o P.O. & P.S.- Adityapur, Assistant Electrical Engineer, Jharkhand State Electricity Board, Adityapur, District-Seraikella-Kharsawan. .... .... .... Respondents ------ CORAM : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ANIL KUMAR CHOUDHARY ------ For the Petitioner : None For the Respondents : Mr. Mukesh Kr. Sinha, Advocate ------ Order No.26 Dated- 31/07/2025 No one turns up on behalf of the petitioner in spite of repeated calls. Learned counsel appearing for the Respondents submit that there is no merit in this case, hence, the petitioner is not diligent in prosecuting this case. Accordingly, this case is dismissed for non-prosecution. (Anil Kumar Choudhary, J.) Abhiraj/