1 2025:CGHC:19945 NAFR HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR WPC No. 2251 of 2025 1 - Erenicus Bakhla S/o Late Shri Jefrian Bakhla Aged About 63 Years Caste Uraon, R/o Village Bandhiyakhar, Tahsil Pathalgaon, District Jashpur (C.G.) ... Petitioner versus 1 - State of Chhattisgarh Through Secretary Department Of Revenue And Disaster Management, Mahanadi Bhawan, Naya Raipur Atal Nagar, District Raipur (C.G.) 2 - Board of Revenue Old Commissioner Complex Bilaspur, District Bilaspur (C.G.) 3 - Commissioner Surguja Division Ambikapur, District Surguja (C.G.) 4 - Sub-Divisional Officer Tahsil Pathalgaon, District Jashpur (C.G.) 5 - Tahsildar Tahsil Pathalgaon, District Jashpur (C.G.) 6 - Korno Ram S/o Shri Madhuram Caste Mahkul, R/o Village Tildega, Tahsil Pathalgaon, District Jashpur (C.G.) ... Respondents (Cause title is taken from Case Information System) For Petitioner : Shri Bhaskar Payashi, Advocate For State : Ms. Upasana Mehta, Dy. Government Advocate Digitally signed by GOPAL SINGH Date: 2025.05.07 12:15:13 +0530 2 Hon’ble Shri Justice Amitendra Kishore Prasad Order on Board 01/05/2025 1. By this petition, the petitioner seeks the following reliefs: “10.1 That this Hon'ble Court may kindly be pleased to issue a writ/order or suitable direction to the Respondent authorities to produce record for kind perusal of this Hon'ble Court. 10.2 That this Hon'ble Court may kindly be pleased to issue an appropriate writ/order or suitable direction for quashing the notices dt. 09/04/2025 and 23/04/2025, issued by Tahsildar directing for handing over possession of the bhumiswami land to the respondent Korno Ram. 10.3 That this Hon'ble Court may kindly be pleased to grant any other ancillary relief by issuing any other suitable writ, direction or order, deems fit in the facts and circumstances of the case including cost of petition.” 2. Learned counsel appearing for the petitioner submits that though the Board of Revenue has passed order dated 17.1.2024 which has not been challenged, but, it could not be challenged due to the long ailment of the son of the petitioner, who has subsequently expired. Now, the Tahsildar has issued notice in compliance with the order dated 17.1.2024 passed by the Board of Revenue, as such the petitioner is seeking only 15 days’ time so that he may approach before the concerned Court by filing a suitable application applicable under the law. 3 3. Till 15 days, no coercive step shall be taken against the petitioner in pursuance of the order dated 23.4.2025 passed by the Tahsildar. It is made clear that if till 15 days, no order of any competent Court is obtained, this order will lose its efÏcacy after 15 days. 4. With the aforesaid observations and directions, the writ petition is disposed of. Sd/- (Amitendra Kishore Prasad) JUDGE Gopal Singh