Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Jharkhand · body

2025 DAILYLAW 20916 (JHR)

RAVI SHANKAR OJHA v. THE STATE OF JHARKHAND

B.A./7055/2025 · 2025-09-24

Ambuj Nath

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

Neutral Citation No. (2025:JHHC:29704) IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI B.A. No. 7055 of 2025 Ravi Shankar Ojha, aged about 39 years, son of late Ramnath Ojha, resident of Sri Ram Path, Redma, Daltonganj, P.O.- Daltonganj, P.S.- Sadar, District- Palamu (Jharkhand), at present residing at E-09, Road No.03, Sai Bihar Colony New Madhukam, Hehal, Ranchi, P.O.- Hehal, P.S.- Sukhdeonagar, District- Ranchi (Jharkhand) … Petitioner - Versus - The State of Jharkhand … Opp. Party ------ CORAM: - HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE AMBUJ NATH ----- For the Petitioner : Mr. Pankaj Kumar Dubey, Advocate For the State : Mr. P.D. Agrawal, Spl.P.P. For the Informant : Mr. Priyanshu Nilesh, Advocate : Mr. Rahul Dev, Advocate --- 03/24.09.2025 Heard the parties. The petitioner has been made accused in connection with Chutia P.S. Case No. 23 of 2022, for the offences registered under Sections 406, 420, 34 of the I.P.C., pending in the court of Ms. Khushboo Tyagi, learned Judicial Magistrate, 1st Class, Ranchi. Petitioner is a travel agent. It is alleged that he had taken Rs.7,50,000/- from the informant for booking flight tickets through his agency. The petitioner neither provided the flight tickets nor returned the money. Learned counsel for the informant has submitted that the petitioner is in the habit of cheating his customers. It was further submitted that four cases in various states have been instituted against him. In view of the aforesaid facts, I am not inclined to enlarge the petitioner on bail. Accordingly, his prayer for bail stands rejected. September 24, 2025 (Ambuj Nath, J.) Jay/- Uploaded