Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Rajasthan · body

2025 DAILYLAW 20914 (RAJ)

RAJU RAO S/O SH. GOPAL RAO v. STATE OF RAJASTHAN

CRLMB/7183/2025 · 2025-07-08

Pramil Kumar Mathur

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

[2025:RJ-JP:25160] HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous Bail Application No. 7183/2025 1. Raju Rao S/o Sh. Gopal Rao, Aged About 40 Years, R/o Near Dudhiya Kuwa, Sawantsar, Police Station Gandhina- gar, District Ajmer (Presently Confined In Central Jail Ajmer) 2. Ganesh S/o Sh. Bhanwarlal, Aged About 34 Years, R/o Lal Ghati, Sawantsar, Police Station Gandhinagar, District Ajmer (Presently Confined In Central Jail Ajmer) 3. Vikram Sisodiya S/o Sh. Bhairu Rao, Aged About 25 Years, R/o Ward No. 45, Sawantsar, Police Station Gand- hinagar, District Ajmer (Presently Confined In Central Jail Ajmer) 4. Rohit Rao S/o Sh. Manohar Rao, Aged About 21 Years, R/o Lal Ghati, Ward No. 45, Sawantsar, Police Station Gandhinagar, District Ajmer (Presently Confined In Cen- tral Jail Ajmer) ----Petitioners Versus State Of Rajasthan, Through Pp ----Respondent For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Vishal Gurjar For Respondent(s) : Mr. Jaiprakash Tiwari, PP HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE PRAMIL KUMAR MATHUR Order 08/07/2025 1. The petitioners have preferred this bail application under Section 483 of BNSS in FIR No.88/2025 registered at Police Station-Gandhi Nagar (Ajmer) District Ajmer for the offences un- der Sections 189(2), 126(2) & 115(2) of BNS, 2023. 2. Heard learned counsel for the petitioners as well as learned [2025:RJ-JP:25160] (2 of 3) [CRLMB-7183/2025] Public Prosecutor and perused the material available on record. 3. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioners have falsely been implicated in this case. Learned counsel further submits that in the FIR itself there is no specific act assigned against the present petitioners. He further submits that there is no medical opinion to show that the alleged injuries are dangerous to life. He further submits that the petitioners are behind the bars since 20.05.2025. The trial of the case may take considerable time, therefore, no fruitful purpose would be served by keeping the petitioners in further custody, hence the bail appli- cation of the petitioners may be allowed. 4. Learned Public Prosecutor has vehemently opposed the bail application. 5. On consideration of the rival submission and material available on record and deliberating all the facts and circum- stances of the case and without expressing any opinion on the merits/demerits of the case, I am inclined to grant benefit of bail to the petitioners. 6. Accordingly, the bail application under Section 483 B.N.S.S. is allowed and it is ordered that the petitioners-Raju Rao S/o Sh. Gopal Rao, Ganesh S/o Sh. Bhanwarlal, Vikram Sisodiya S/o Sh. Bhairu Rao & Rohit Rao S/o Sh. Manohar Rao shall be released on bail in connection with FIR No.339/2024 registered at Police Station-Kunhari District Kota on their furnishing a per- sonal bond in the sum of Rs.50,000/- with two sureties of Rs.25,000/- each of them to the satisfaction of the learned trial [2025:RJ-JP:25160] (3 of 3) [CRLMB-7183/2025] court for their appearance before that Court on all the dates till conclusion of the trial. (PRAMIL KUMAR MATHUR),J MAHIMA/114