HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD MATTERS UNDER ARTICLE 227 No. - 3872 of 2023 Court No. - 9 HON'BLE MANISH KUMAR NIGAM, J. 1. Sri Arun Keshari, Advocate, holding brief of Sri Anshul Kumar Singhal, counsel appearing for the petitioner states that this petition has become infructuous. 2. This fact has not been disputed by counsel appearing for the respondent. 3. Accordingly, the petition is dismissed as infructuous. September 4, 2025 Nitika Sri. Versus Counsel for Petitioner(s) : Anshul Kumar Singhal, Krishna Dev Vyas, Sumit Daga Counsel for Respondent(s) : Satyendra Nath Tripathi (Manish Kumar Nigam,J.) Pradeep Rana And Another .....Petitioner(s) Thakur Dwara Gaddi Shri Babalal Ji Maharaj .....Respondent(s) Digitally signed by :- NITIKA SRIVASTAVA High Court of Judicature at Allahabad