Research › Search › Judgment

Madras High Court · body

2025 DAILYLAW 20912 (MAD)

MOORTHI v. STATE REP BY, INSPECTOR OF POLICE

CRL OP/2871/2025 · 2025-02-06

Sunder Mohan

Transfer Petitionbody2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

Crl.O.P.No.2871 of 2025 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS DATED : 06.02.2025 CORAM THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SUNDER MOHAN Crl.O.P.No.2871 of 2025 Moorthi ... Petitioner Vs. The State represented by, The Inspector of Police, Kolathur Police Station, Salem District. (Crime No.6 of 2025). ... Respondent PRAYER: Criminal Original Petition filed under Section 483 of BNSS, pleased to enlarge the petitioner on bail, in connection with the Crime No.06 of 2025, pending investigation on the file of the respondent Police. For Petitioner : Mr.M.Senthil Kumar For Respondent : Mr.A.Gopinath Government Advocate (Crl.Side) O R D E R This Criminal Original Petition has been filed by the petitioner, who were arrested and remanded to judicial custody on 11.01.2025, seeking bail in Crime No.6 of 2025 registered for the offence under Section 310(4) and 310(5) of BNS Act. 1/5 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis Crl.O.P.No.2871 of 2025 2. The case of the prosecution is that the petitioner along with other accused attempted to commit dacoity. Hence, the case. 3. Learned counsel appearing for the petitioner submitted that the petitioner are innocent persons and they have been falsely implicated in this case. He further submitted that, in any case, the petitioner is in custody from 11.01.2025 and that since further custody is not required for the purpose of investigation, they may be released on bail. 4. Learned Government Advocate (Crl.Side), per contra submitted that the petitioner is an habitual offendor and there are six previous cases against the petitioner. 5. Heard the learned counsel appearing for the petitioner and the learned Government Advocate (Crl.Side) for the respondent Police and perused the materials available on record. 6. Considering, the period of incarceration; the petitioner is on bail in other cases; and that since further custody is not required for the purpose of 2/5 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis Crl.O.P.No.2871 of 2025 investigation, this Court is inclined to grant bail to the petitioner with certain conditions. 7. Accordingly, the petitioner is ordered to be released on bail on his executing a bond for a sum of Rs.15,000/- (Rupees Fifteen Thousand only) with two sureties, each for a like sum to the satisfaction of the learned Judicial Magistrate No.I, Mettur and on further conditions that: [a] the sureties shall affix their photographs and Left Thumb Impression in the surety bond and the Magistrate may obtain a copy of their Aadhar card or Bank pass Book to ensure their identity; [b] the petitioner shall report before the respondent Police, everyday at 10.30 a.m., until further orders; [c] the petitioner shall not abscond either during investigation or trial; [d] the petitioner shall not tamper with evidence or witness either during investigation or trial; [e] On breach of any of the aforesaid conditions, the 3/5 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis Crl.O.P.No.2871 of 2025 learned Magistrate/Trial Court is entitled to take appropriate action against the petitioner in accordance with law as if the conditions have been imposed and the petitioner released on bail by the learned Magistrate/Trial Court himself as laid down by the Hon'ble Supreme Court in P.K.Shaji vs. State of Kerala [(2005)AIR SCW 5560]; [f] If the accused thereafter absconds, a fresh FIR can be registered under Section 269 B.N.S. 06.02.2025 Sma To 1. Judicial Magistrate No.1, Mettur 2. The Inspector of Police, Kolathur Police Station, Salem District. 3. The Superintendent, Central Prison, Salem. 4. The Public Prosecutor, High Court of Madras. 4/5 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis Crl.O.P.No.2871 of 2025 SUNDER MOHAN., J. Sma Crl.O.P.No.2871 of 2025 06.02.2025 5/5 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis