K. RANGA REDDY & 14 OTHERS v. THE CHAIRMAN AND MANAGING DIRECTOR & ANOTHER
WP/12957/2005 · 2025-02-28
Maheswara Rao Kuncheam
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 20912 (AP) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 20912 (AP) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
APHC010296062005
IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH (Special Original Jurisdiction) FRIDAY, THE TWENTY TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE MAHESWARA RAO KUNCHEAM WRIT PETITION NO: Between: K. Ranga Reddy & 14 Others and Others The Chairman And Managing Director Another and Others Counsel for the Petitioner(S):
1. V JAGAPATHI Counsel for the Respondent(S):
1. K ANNAPURNA REDDY
2. The Court made the following
Sri K. Koutilya, learned counsel, represented Sri V. Jagapathi, learned counsel for the petitioners. He informed the Court that, due to subsequent events that have taken place in the lis, the matter has become and no further orders are necessary from this Court.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) FRIDAY, THE TWENTY EIGHTH DAY OF FEBRUARY TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE MAHESWARA RAO KUNCHEAM WRIT PETITION NO: 12957/2005 K. Ranga Reddy & 14 Others and Others ...PETITIONER(S) AND The Chairman And Managing Director Another and ...RESPONDENT(S) Counsel for the Petitioner(S): Counsel for the Respondent(S):
K ANNAPURNA REDDY The Court made the following Order: Sri K. Koutilya, learned counsel, represented Sri V. Jagapathi, learned counsel for the petitioners. He informed the Court that, due to subsequent events that have taken place in the lis, the matter has become infructuous, and no further orders are necessary from this Court.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH [3504] EIGHTH DAY OF FEBRUARY THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE MAHESWARA RAO KUNCHEAM ...PETITIONER(S) ...RESPONDENT(S) Sri K. Koutilya, learned counsel, represented Sri V. Jagapathi, learned counsel for the petitioners. He informed the Court that, due to subsequent infructuous,
2
2. Recording the submissions made by the learned counsel for the petitioner, this Writ Petition is dismissed as infructuous. There shall be no order as to costs.
As a sequel, interlocutory applications pending, if any shall stand closed. _______________________________ MAHESWARA RAO KUNCHEAM, J
Date: 28.02.2025
PNS