Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Andhra Pradesh · body

2025 DAILYLAW 20909 (AP)

S ALIVELAMMA v. THE STATE OF AP

WP/14942/2025 · 2025-06-30

Harinath N

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

APHC010295592025 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3457] TUESDAY,THE FIRST DAY OF JULY TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE HARINATH.N WRIT PETITION NO: 14942/2025 Between: 1. S ALIVELAMMA, C/O. ERIKALA. NARAYANA SWAMY AGED ABOUT 40 YEARS, RESIDENT OF BATHALAPALLE VILLAGE, BATHALAPALLE MANDAL, SRI SATYA SAI DISTRICT, ANDHRA PRADESH - 515661. ...PETITIONER AND 1. THE STATE OF AP, REP BY ITS PRINCIPAL SECRETARY, HOME DEPARTMENT, SECRETARIAT BUILDINGS, VELAGAPUDI AT AMARAVATHI, GUNTUR DISTRICT, ANDHRA PRADESH. 2. THE CIRCLE INSPECTOR OF POLICE, BATHALAPALLE POLICE STATION, BATHALAPALLE, SRI SATYA SAI DISTRICT, ANDHRA PRADESH. 3. THE STATION HOUSE OFFICER, BATHALAPALLE POLICE STATION, BATHALAPALLE, SRI SATYA SAI DISTRICT, ANDHRA PRADESH. ...RESPONDENT(S): Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased topleased to issue any writ, order, or direction, particularly one in the nature of a Writ of Mandamus, declaring the actions of the respondents 2 and 3 not to put pressurized the petitioner without complaint and also not to harass the petitioner for asking to come to the police station without following due process of law and pass 2 HN, J W.P.No.14942 of 2025 Counsel for the Petitioner: 1. TADIKAMALLA J V H PRASAD Counsel for the Respondent(S): 1. GP FOR HOME The Court made the following: 3 HN, J W.P.No.14942 of 2025 ORDER: Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and the learned Assistant Government Pleader for Home appearing for the respondents. 2. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the 3rd respondent is repeatedly summoning the petitioner, despite there being no case registered against him. 3. The learned Assistant Government Pleader, on written instructions, submits that the petitioner is not being summoned in connection with any pending case. 4. Be that as it may, the 3rd respondent is directed not to cause any disturbance to the petitioner or interfere with his peaceful life, except in accordance with the due process of law. 5. With the above direction, this Writ Petition is disposed of. There shall be no order as to costs. Pending miscellaneous petitions, if any, shall stand closed. ___________________ JUSTICE HARINATH.N 1st July, 2025 cbn 4 HN, J W.P.No.14942 of 2025 236 HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE HARINATH.N WRIT PETITION No.14942 of 2025 1st July, 2025 cbn