IN THE HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH, SHIMLA CWP No.11997 of 2025 Date of Decision: 25.07.2025 _____________________________________________________________________ Roop Lal & Ors. ……...Petitioners Versus State of Himachal Pradesh & Ors. …....Respondents Coram Hon’ble Mr. Justice Sandeep Sharma, Judge. Whether approved for reporting? For the Petitioners: Mr. Hirdaya Ram & Mr. Suresh Singh Sainin, Advocates. For the respondents: Mr. Rajan Kahol, Mr. Vishal Panwar & Mr. B.C. Verma, Additional Advocates General with Mr. Ravi Chauhan, Deputy Advocate General. ___________________________________________________________________________ Sandeep Sharma, J. (Oral) Before reply, if any, from the respondents could be received, learned counsel representing the petitioners, on instructions, states that petitioners would be content and satisfied in case directions are issued to the respondents to consider the case of the petitioners in light of judgment rendered by Coordinate Bench of this Court in CWP No. 8148 of 2022 titled as Yashwant Singh Vs. State of Himachal Pradesh & Ors. along with connected matters, wherein issue raised in the instant proceedings already stands adjudicated. 3. While putting in appearance on behalf of respondents, Mr. B.C.Verma, learned Additional Advocate General, fairly states that he is not averse to aforesaid innocuous prayer made on behalf of the petitioner. 4. Consequently, in view of the above, this Court, without going into the merits of the case, deems it fit to dispose of the present petition with a direction to the respondents to consider and decide the case of the petitioners in light of Yashwant Singh (supra), expeditiously, preferably within a period of six weeks. Ordered accordingly. Needless to say, authority concerned, while doing the needful in terms of instant order, shall afford an opportunity of being heard to the petitioner and pass speaking order thereafter. Pending applications, if any, stand disposed of. July 25, 2025 (Sandeep Sharma), (sunil) Judge 2