IN THE HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH AT SHIMLA COPC No.1132 of 2025 Decided on 01st January 2026 Shri Bhanwar Singh …Petitioner Versus Shri Ritesh Chauhan, IAS and others …Respondents Coram Hon’ble Mr. Justice Ajay Mohan Goel, Judge 1Whether approved for reporting? For the petitioner: Mr. Rakesh Kumar Dogra, Advocate. For the respondents: Mr. R.P. Singh, Deputy Advocate General, for respondents No.1 and 2. Mr. Vivek Thakur, Advocate, for respondent No.3. Ajay Mohan Goel, Judge (Oral) Learned Deputy Advocate General points out that the contempt petition is completely misconceived, because, as the petitioner is still continuing in service, therefore, there is no occasion for him to be granted pension in terms of the judgment passed by the Court. 2. In view of the above, the contempt petition is dismissed as misconceived. (Ajay Mohan Goel) Judge January 01, 2026 (Vinod)