Research › Search › Judgment

Calcutta High Court · body

2025 DAILYLAW 20897 (CAL)

MD. NUR HAQUE AND ANOTHER v. SHAKINA ISLAM

CRR/1818/2025 · 2025-09-11

Jay Sengupta

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

AD 398 September 11, 2025 Ct. 28 SG CRR 1818 of 2025 CRAN 1 of 2025 In the matter of: Md. Nur Haque and another … petitioners Mr. Sumanta Ganguly … for the petitioners Mr. Soujanyo Pattanayak Mr. G.S. Kaderi … for the OP Heard learned counsels for the parties. Learned counsel for the petitioners submits that the petitioners would not like to press this application and would, instead, take up all the points before the appropriate forum at an appropriate stage. On the prayer of learned counsel for the petitioners, the revisional application is dismissed as not pressed. The petitioners shall be at liberty to take up all the points before the appropriate forum. Urgent photostat certified copy of this order, if applied for, be supplied to the parties upon compliance of requisite formalities. (Jay Sengupta, J.)