MITA RAY v. PURUSHOTTAM PATTANAYAK INSPECTOR IN CHARGE DUM DUM
WPCRC/21/2025 · 2025-01-29
Rajasekhar Mantha
Transfer Petitionbody2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 20896 (CAL) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 20896 (CAL) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
29.01.2025 Court No.13 Item No. 2 pk
WPCRC 21 of 2025 In W.P.A. No. 26492 of 2022
Mita Ray Versus Mr. Purushottam Pattanayak
Mr. Ramasish Mukherjee, Mr. Amartya Mohan Bhattacharyya …For the petitioner.
Mr. Swapan Banerjee, Mr. Nilotpal Chatterjee, Mr. Diptendu Narayan Banerjee, Mr. Debapriya Chatterjee ..for the State.
1. Mr. Suprakas Pattanayak, the Inspector-in- Charge, Dum Dum Police Station is present in Court. He has filed report dated 29.01.2025 indicating that all steps being taken to protect the petitioner. He tenders unconditional apology.
2. This Court accepts the same.
3. The Inspector-in-Charge, Dum Dum Police Station upon receipt of any complaint from the petitioner even on telephone shall immediately depute a constable to enquire into the grievance of the petitioner.
4. With the aforesaid observations, the contempt application is disposed of. Rule, if any, shall stand discharged.
2
5. Personal presence of the alleged contemnor is dispensed with.
(Rajasekhar Mantha, J.)