Research › Search › Judgment

Madras High Court · body

2025 DAILYLAW 208900 (MAD)

Sureshkumar v. The Inspector General of Registration

WP(MD)/24997/2025 · 2025-10-15

G R Swaminathan

Transfer Petitionbody2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

W.P(MD)No.24997 of 2025 BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT DATED : 15.10.2025 CORAM THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE G.R.SWAMINATHAN W.P(MD)No.24997 of 2025 Sureshkumar ... Petitioner Vs. 1.The Inspector General of Registration, 100, Santhome High Road, Pattinapakkam, Chennai – 600 028. 2.The District Registrar (Administration), Collectorate Campus, Palayamkottai, Kokkirakulam, Tirunelveli – 627 009. 3.The Sub Registrar, Radhapuram Sub Registrar Office, Radhapuram, Tirunelveli District. ... Respondents Prayer : Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, praying this Court to issue a Writ of Certiorarified Mandamus, to call for the records pertaining to the impugned check slip issued by the third respondent in RFL/Radhapuram/48/2025 dated 01.09.2025 and quash the 1/4 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis W.P(MD)No.24997 of 2025 same as arbitrary, illegal and consequently directing the third respondent to accept and register the partition deed presented in Document No. TP/231081823/2025 dated 28.08.2025 pertaining to the properties situated in S.Nos.143/1A1 and S.No.142/1B to an extent of 4.50 cents (from the total extent of 21.25 cents) situated at Chettikulam Village, Radhapuram Taluk, Tirunelveli District. For Petitioner : Mr.P.Saravanakumar For Respondents : Mr.D.Gandhiraj Special Government Pleader ORDER Heard both sides. 2.The writ petitioner purchased the petition mentioned property under the sale deed dated 28.08.2025. Registration was refused by invoking Section 22A of the Registration Act, 1908. Challenging the same, this writ petition has been filed. 3.I decline to interfere with the impugned refusal check slip. This is because the parties have shown the road as one of the four boundaries. 2/4 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis W.P(MD)No.24997 of 2025 4.The petitioner informs the Court that the sale deed will be suitably amended and road will not be shown as one of the four boundaries. It is further undertaken that no housing or any other development can take place without getting permission form the competent authority. The said undertaking is recorded. 5.In this view of the matter, the impugned refusal check slip is quashed. The parties are at liberty to re-present the document after amending the same. It shall be registered and released subject to the fulfilment of the other usual formalities. 6.This Writ Petition is allowed accordingly. No costs. 15.10.2025 NCC : Yes / No Index : Yes / No Internet : Yes / No MGA 3/4 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis W.P(MD)No.24997 of 2025 G.R.SWAMINATHAN, J. MGA To 1.The Inspector General of Registration, 100, Santhome High Road, Pattinapakkam, Chennai – 600 028. 2.The District Registrar (Administration), Collectorate Campus, Palayamkottai, Kokkirakulam, Tirunelveli – 627 009. 3.The Sub Registrar, Radhapuram Sub Registrar Office, Radhapuram, Tirunelveli District. W.P(MD)No.24997 of 2025 15.10.2025 4/4 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis