MOHD ISLAM ANSARI v. DIRECTOR PERSONNEL CENTRAL COALFIELDS LIMITED
C.Rev./92/2024 · 2025-07-11
Deepak Roshan
Review Petitionbody2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 20889 (JHR) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 20889 (JHR) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
2025:JHHC:18967
1
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI
Civil Review No. 92 of 2024 Mohd. Islam Ansari, Aged about 59 years, Son of Late JhagruMiyan, Resident of Quarter No. W/B 93, Gayatri Colony, Kathara, P.O. Kathara, P.S. Bokaro Thermal, District Bokaro (Jharkhand). ... … Petitioner(s)
Versus
1. Director (Personnel), Central Coalfields Limited, having its office at Darbhanga House, Near Kutchery, P.O.-GPO, P.S.-Kotwali, District- Ranchi (Jharkhand).
2. General Manager, Central Coalfields Limited, having its office at Darbhanga House, Near Kutchery, P.O.-GPO, P.S.-Kotwali, District- Ranchi (Jharkhand).
3. General Manager, Central Coalfields Limited, Kathara Washery, P.O.- Kathara, P.S.-Kathara, District-Bokaro (Jharkhand).
4. Project Officer, Amlo Project, Central Coalfields Limited, Amlo Project, P.O.-Dhori, P.S.- Dhori, District Bokaro (Jharkhand)
… … Opposite Party(s)
CORAM: HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE DEEPAK ROSHAN For the Petitioner(s) : Mr. Shahid Khan, Advocate
Md. Razaullah Ansari, Advocate For the Opposite Party(s) : Mr. A. K. Das, Advocate
Ms. Swati Shalini, Advocate
--------
Order No. 06 /Dated: 11th July 2025
The instant review petition has been filed by the petitioner for review of the order dated 31.08.2022 passed in W.P.(S) No. 5370 of 2015.
2. Admittedly, the petitioner has not raised the pleading with regard to the standing order.
3.
Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that since that was the law point, the same could be raised here.
4. This Court is sitting in the review jurisdiction wherein the petitioner will have to show whether there is any error apparent on record. It is an admitted case of the petitioner that the said pleading was never given in
2025:JHHC:18967
2
the writ application. In that view of the matter there is no error apparent on record.
5. Accordingly, the instant review petition stands dismissed.
(Deepak Roshan, J.) Amit