Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Andhra Pradesh · body

2025 DAILYLAW 20888 (AP)

MUDURNI CHITTAMMA v. THE STATE OF AP

WP/14686/2025 · 2025-06-19

Harinath N

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH :: AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) FRIDAY, THE TWENTIETH DAY OF JUNE TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE HARINATH.N WRIT PETITION NO: 14686 OF 2025 Between: 1. Mudunuri Chittamma, W/o. Rama Raju, Aged 51 years, Occ; business, Official Colony, Sri Nagar, Gajuwaaka. R/o. D.No.27-3-31, Visakhapatnam, Visakhapatnam District. 2. Mudunuri Rama Raju, S/o. Appal Raju, Aged 55 years, Occ: Transport Business, R/o. D.No.27-3-31, Official Colony, Sri Nagar, Gajuwaaka. Visakhapatnam, Visakhapatnam District. ...PETITIONERS 1 & 2 AND 1. The State of AP, Rep by its Principal Secretary, Home Department, A.P. Secretariat Buildings Velagapudi, Amaravati, Guntur District. 2. The Commissioner of Police, Visakhapatnam Commissionarate, Visakhapatnam District. 3. The Station House officer, Visakhapatnam Commissionarate, Police Station, Visakhapatnam District. 4. Gorla @ Transport Lakhsmi, W/o. Satyanaraya, Aged 51 years, Occ: business. R/o. Visakhapatnam, Visakhapatnam District. D.No.27-2-92, Chandrapalem Gajuwaaka ...RESPONDENTS Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court be pleased to issue a Writ, Order or Direction, more particularly one in the nature of Writ of Mandamus, declaring the in action of the 2nd Respondent may to consider representation dt. 26.05.2025 and 31-05-2025 made by Petitipngr to direct the 3rd Respondent to registering FIR inspite of the vvfi!ten;*^|fnplaint dt. 22-05-2025, against unofficial respondent as illegal, arb^af^4 and in violation of principles of natural Justice against the Provisions of BNSS Act and also against all settle principles of law as illegal, arbitrary, and in violation of principles Natural Justice against the Provisions of BNSS Act and also against all settle principles of law. Consequentially to direct the 2nd respondent to consider representation dt. 26.05.2025 and 31-05-2025 made by Petitioner to direct the 3rd Respondent to registering FIR inspite of the written complaint dt. 22-05-2025, against unofficial respondent. lA NO: 1 OF 2025 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to direct the 2nd respondent to consider representation dt. 26.05.2025 & 31-05-2025 made by Petitioner to direct the 3rd Respondent to registering FIR inspite of the written complaint dt. 22-05-2025, against unofficial respondent. Counsel for the Petitioner: SRI KALLA TULASI DURGAMBA Counsel for the Respondent Nos. 1 to 3: GP FOR HOME Counsel for the Respondent No.4: — The Court made the following: ORDER 4^ APHC010294022025 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3457] FRIDAY. THE TWENTIETH DAY OF JUNE TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE HARINATH.N WRIT PETITION NO: 14686/2025 Between; Mudurni Chittamma and Others ...PETITIONER(S) AND The State Of Ap and Others ...RESPONDENT(S) Counsel for the Petitloner{S): 1. KALLA TULASI DURGAMBA Counsel for the Respondent(S): 1.GP FOR HOME The Court made the following; ORDER:- Heard learned counsel for the petitioners and learned Assistant Government Pleader appearing for the Home. Learned counsel for the petitioners submits that the 1®* petitioner is aggrieved by the inaction of 2'^'^ respondent in not considering the petitioner’s 2. representations dated 26.05.2025 and 31.05.2025. Learned Assistant Government Pleader appearing for the Home submits that the 1®* petitioner’s representations dated 26.05.2025 and 31.05.2025 will be considered by the 3'^'^ respondent, as per law. Considering the facts and circumstances of the case, this Court is inclined 3. 4. rd to dispose off the Writ Petition at the stage of admission itself, directing the 3 respondent to consider the 1®* petitioner’s representations dated 26.05.2025 and 31.05.2025, in accordance with law and the procedure contemplated under Section 173(3) of the BNSS, 2023. Accordingly, this Writ Petition is disposed off. There shall be no order 5. as to costs. As a sequel, miscellaneous petitions pending, if any, sh^stand closed. Sd/- M. SRINIVAS ASSISTANTREGISTRAR / //TRUE COPY// SECTION OFFICER To, 1. The Princi^pal Secretary, Home Department, A.P. Secretariat Buildings Velagapudi, Amaravati, Guntur District. I Police, Visakhapatnam Commissionarate Visakhapatnam District. 3. The Station House Officer, Visakhapatnam Commissionarate, Police Station, Visakhapatnam District. 4. One CC to Sri Kalla Tulasi Durgamba, Advocate [OPUC] 5. Two CCs to GP for Home, High Court of Andhra Pradesh. [OUT] 6. Three CD Copies f HIGH COURT DATED:20/06/2025 ORDER WP.No.14686 of 2025 DISPOSING OF THE W.P. AT THE STAGE OF ADMISSION, WITHOUT COSTS