Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Andhra Pradesh · body

2025 DAILYLAW 20881 (AP)

Thunga Kanthamma v. The State of Andhra Pradesh

WP/19514/2020 · 2025-08-17

Venkata Jyothirmai Pratapa

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

APHC010294972020 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3396] MONDAY,THE EIGHTEENTH DAY OF AUGUST TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE DR JUSTICE VENKATA JYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA WRIT PETITION NO: 19514/2020 Between: 1. THUNGA KANTHAMMA,, W/O.SUBBARAYUDU, AGE 63 YEAR, OCC AGRICULTURE, R/O.THUMMACHETLAPALLI VILLAGE, C.KANDULAVARIPALLI PANCHAYAT, CHITVEL MANDAL, YSR KADAPA DISTRICT. ...PETITIONER AND 1. THE STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH, - HOME DEPARTMENT REP.BY ITS PRINCIPAL SECRETARY - HOME, SECRETARIAT OF ANDHRA PRADESH VELAGAPUDI, GUNTUR DISTRICT. 2. THE SUPERINTENDENT OF POLICE, YSR KADAPA DISTRICT. 3. THE DEPUTY SUPERINTENDENT OF POLICE, RAJAMPETA, YSR KADAPA DISTRICT. 4. THE STATION HOUSE OFFICER, CHITVEL POLICE STATION, KODUR MANDAL, YSR KADAPA DISTRICT. ...RESPONDENT(S): Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased topleased to issue a Writ of Mandamus, or any other appropriate writ, order or direction, declaring the action of the 3rd and 4th Respondents in illegally interfering with the Petitioners agricultural activity in the property admeasuring an extent of Ac.1-90 cents in Sy.No.877/B10 and Ac.2.00 in Sy.No.877/B11 situated at Thummachetlapalli Village, Chitvel Revenue Village, Chitvel Mandal, YSR Kadapa District, as illegal, arbitrary and without jurisdiction and further direct the Respondents 3 and 4 not to interfere with the agricultural activity of the Petitioner in the said property and pass IA NO: 1 OF 2020 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased pleased to grant interim direction directing the Respondents 3 & 4 herein not to interfere with the agricultural activity being carried on by the Petitioner in the property admeasuring an extent of Ac.1-90 cents in Sy.No.877/B10 and Ac.2.00 in Sy.No.877/B11 situated at Thummachetlapalli Village, Chitvel Revenue Village, Chitvel Mandal, YSR Kadapa District, pending disposal of the above writ petition and pass Counsel for the Petitioner: 1. P RAMABHOOPAL REDDY Counsel for the Respondent(S): 1. GP FOR HOME The Court made the following: THE HONOURABLE DR JUSTICE VENKATA JYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA WRIT PETITION NO:19514 of 2020 ORDER: This Writ Petition is filed under Article 226 of Constitution of India with the following prayer for: “…pleased to issue a Writ of Mandamus, or any other appropriate writ, order or direction, declaring the action of the 3rd and 4th Respondents in illegally interfering with the Petitioners agricultural activity in the property admeasuring an extent of Ac.1-90 cents in Sy.No.877/B10 and Ac.2.00 in Sy.No.877/B11 situated at Thummachetlapalli Village, Chitvel Revenue Village, Chitvel Mandal, YSR Kadapa District, as illegal, arbitrary and without jurisdiction and further direct the Respondent Nos.3 and 4 not to interfere with the agricultural activity of the Petitioner in the said property and pass…” 2. None represented for the petitioner. 3. As seen from the material available on record, it is a case where the petitioner is seeking a direction to the respondent Nos.3 & 4 not to interfere with the agricultural activity of the petitioner. 4. When the matter was taken up for hearing, Sri V.Farooq, learned Assistant Government Pleader for Home for the respondents, on instructions would submit that the respondent-Police are not interfering into the agricultural activity of the petitioner with regard to the property admeasuring to an extent of Ac.1-90 cents in Sy.No.877/B10 and Ac.2.00 in Sy.No.877/B11 situated at Thummachetlapalli Village, Chitvel Revenue Village, Chitvel Mandal, YSR Kadapa District. 5. In that view of the matter, the Writ petition is disposed of. However, the Police are directed not to interfere into the agricultural activity of the petitioner herein without following due process of law. There shall be no order as to costs. As a sequel thereto, miscellaneous petitions pending, if any, shall stand closed. _________________________________________ Dr. JUSTICE VENKATA JYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA Date: 18.08.2025. SRT HON’BLE DR. JUSTICE VENKATA JYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA W.P.No.19514 of 2020 Dated.18.08.2025 SRT 175