KUMARI RIDDHIMA GUPTA, DAUGHTER OF LATE SHRI SHEKHAR GUPTA(FATHER) v. STATE OF RAJASTHAN
CRLMA/675/2025 · 2026-07-23
Anoop Kumar Dhand
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 2088 (RAJ) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 2088 (RAJ) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous Application No. 675/2025 CNR: RJHC021127792025 | URN: CRLMA / 1467U / 2025 in S.B. Criminal Misc. Petition No.1642/2021
1. Kumari Riddhima Gupta, Daughter Of Late Shri Shekhar Gupta(Father), Aged About 13 Years, And Late Smt. Reena Gupta (The Mother), (Parental Address- 78 B Vishnu Hill Town Crpc Area, Kalu Ki Dhani, Alwar Gate Ajmer.) Through Her Guardian Smt Madhu Goyal W/o Shri Rajendra Goyal, Aged About 63 Years, R/o 19 A, R.k. Puram, Bhajanganj, Ajmer (Rajasthan) The Real Grand- Mother, In Her Capacity As A Guardian Of The 2 Minor Grand-Daughters (Being The Daughters Of Her Own Daughter Smt Reena)
2. Kumari Aaishwarya Gupta, Daughter Of Late Shri Shekhar Gupta(Father), Aged About 10 Years, And Late Smt. Reena Gupta (The Mother), (Parental Address- 78 B Vishnu Hill Town Crpc Area, Kalu Ki Dhani, Alwar Gate Ajmer.) Through Her Guardian Smt Madhu Goyal W/o Shri Rajendra Goyal, Aged About 63 Years, R/o 19 A, R.k. Puram, Bhajanganj, Ajmer (Rajasthan) The Real Grand- Mother, In Her Capacity As A Guardian Of The 2 Minor Grand-Daughters (Being The Daughters Of Her Own Daughter Smt Reena) ----Petitioner-Applicant Versus
1. State of Rajasthan, through the PP, Raj High Court Premises, Jaipur Bench Jaipur.
2. SHO, Police Station, Civil Lines, Ajmer.
3. Superintendent of Police, Ajmer. ----Respondents For Petitioner(s) : Mr.Janardan Pandit with Ms.Dolly Meena For Respondent(s) : Mr.N.S. Dhakar, PP with Mr.Anirudh Singh
(2 of 2) [CRLMA-675/2025] JUSTICE ANOOP KUMAR DHAND
Order 23/07/2026
1. By way of filing the instant criminal misc. application, a prayer has been made to recall the order dated 20.09.2025 passed by this Court and the subsequent order dated 15.10.2025 passed by the Registrar (Judicial), by which the S.B. Criminal Misc. (Petition) No.1642/2021 submitted by the petitioners has been dismissed for want of compliance of the peremptory order.
2.
Learned counsel for the petitioners submits that on account of business in performing the affairs of marriage of the daughter, the peremptory order passed by this Court could not be complied with and the defects pointed out by the Office could not be cured within the time prescribed. Counsel submits that the petitioner is ready and willing to cure the defects pointed out by the Office. Counsel further submits that important question of law and facts are involved in the instant petition, which are required to be decided on its merits, hence, the aforesaid orders be recalled.
3. The instant misc. application stands allowed for the reasons stated therein. The order dated 20.09.2025 passed by this Court and the order dated 15.10.2025 passed by the Registrar (Judicial) stand recalled.
4. The S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous (Petition) No.1642/2021 is ordered to be restored to its original number.
5. Office to proceed.
(ANOOP KUMAR DHAND),J Aayush Sharma/91