Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
APHC010620382025
IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3457] MONDAY, THE TWENTY SECOND DAY OF JUNE TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY SIX PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE HARINATH.N WRIT PETITION NO: 32120/2025 Between:
1. GUTTULA SRINIVAS, , S/O. SURYANARAYANA, AGED 49 YEARS, R/O. L.B. NAGAR, RAZOLE, EAST GODAVARI DISTRICT, ANDHRA PRADESH. ...PETITIONER AND
1. THE STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH, REP. BY ITS PRINCIPAL SECRETARY, MUNICIPAL
ADMINISTRATION AND URBAN DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY, SECRETARIAT,
VELAGAPUDI, AMARAVATHI, GUNTUR DISTRICT, ANDHRA PRADESH. 2. THE AMALAPURAM MUNICIPALITY, AMALAPURAM, EAST GODAVARI DISTRICT, ANDHRA PRADESH, REPRESENTED BY ITS COMMISSIONER. 3. SUNKARA LAKSHMI MANI KUMARI, W/O. VENKATESWARA RAO, AGED ABOUT 41 YEARS, R/O. 1-3-24, NEAR BLACK BRIDGE (NALLA VANTINA), AMALAPURAM, EAST GODAVARI DISTRICT, ANDHRA PRADESH. ...RESPONDENT(S): Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased to issue a writ or order or direction more particularly one in the nature of Writ of Mandamus declaring the action of the 2nd Respondent in illegally mutating the property bearing D.No.1-3-24, K.N.F. Road, Amalapuram
2
(Assessment No. 1059005914) in the name of the 3rd respondent i.e., Smt. Sunkara Lakshmi Mani Kumari, as blatantly illegal, arbitrary, unconstitutional, as well as oppose to Article 300-A of the Constitution of India and in utter violation of the orders of this Hon'ble Court in W.P. No. 18179 of 2021 consequentially, direct the respondent No.2 to immediately restore the mutation of the said property in the name of the Petitioner, as was rightfully done vide Endorsement TTP No. 202/2014-A2 dated 29.11.2014 forthwith by considering the representation dated 31.12.2024 IA NO: 1 OF 2025 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to direct the respondent No.2 to immediately restore the mutation of the said property in the name of the Petitioner, as was rightfully done vide Endorsement TTP No.202/2014-A2 dated 29.11.2014 forthwith by considering the representation dated 31.12.2024 pending disposal of the above writ petition Counsel for the Petitioner:
1. V SAI KUMAR Counsel for the Respondent(S):
1. SIREESHA RANI VALLABHANENI, STANDING COUNSEL FOR MUNICIPALITIES
2.
GP MUNCIPAL ADMN AND URBAN DEV AP The Court made the following:
3
THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE HARINATH.N WRIT PETITION NO: 32120 OF 2025 ORDER:-
The learned counsel appearing for the petitioner seeks permission of this Court to withdraw the present Writ Petition. 2. Permission is accorded. 3. Accordingly, this Writ Petition is dismissed as withdrawn, granting liberty to the petitioner to file a fresh petition. There shall be no order as to costs. 4. Pending miscellaneous petitions, if any, shall stand closed. ____________________ JUSTICE HARINATH.N 22.06.2026 Pmk
4
128 THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE HARINATH.N
WRIT PETITION NO: 32120 of 2025 Date: 22.06.2026
Pmk