Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Karnataka · body

2025 DAILYLAW 20877 (KAR)

SHIMOGGA URBAN DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY v. INCOME TAX OFFICER

WP/8753/2025 · 2025-04-02

S R Krishna Kumar

Transfer Petitionbody2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

- 1 - NC: 2025:KHC:13949 WP No. 8753 of 2025 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 2ND DAY OF APRIL, 2025 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE S.R.KRISHNA KUMAR WRIT PETITION NO. 8753 OF 2025 (T-IT) BETWEEN: SHIMOGGA URBAN DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY ORIGINALLY KNOWN AS 'SHIMOGGA BHADRAVATHI URBAN DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY' (A GOVERNMENT AUTHORITY SET UP BY THE GOVERNMENT OF KARNATAKA UNDER URBAN DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITIES ACT) HAVING ITS OFFICE AT 1ST FLOOR, SUDA COMPLEX, 100 FEET ROAD, VINOBANAGARA, SHIMOGGA – 577 204. REPRESENTED BY ITS COMMISSIONER VISHWANATH P. MUDDAJJI, AGED ABOUT 71 YEARS (SENIOR CITIZEN NOT CLAIMED) SHIMOGGA URBAN DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY PAN NO. AAALS2328H …PETITIONER (BY SRI. BALRAM R. RAO, ADVOCATE) AND: INCOME TAX OFFICER WARD 1 AND TPS, SHIMOGA, INCOME TAX OFFICE, SHIMOGA NO.75, 100 FEE ROAD, GOPAL GOWDA EXTENSION, SHIVAMOGGA, KARNATAKA – 577 201. …RESPONDENT (BY SRI. M. DILIP, ADVOCATE) Digitally signed by CHANDANA B M Location: High Court of Karnataka - 2 - NC: 2025:KHC:13949 WP No. 8753 of 2025 THIS WRIT PETITION IS FILED UNDER ARTICLE 226 AND 227 OF CONSTITUTION OF INDIA PRAYING TO DIRECTION UNDER ARTICLE 226 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA CALLING FOR THE RECORDS OF THE PETITIONERS CASE AND AFTER EXAMINING THE LEGALITY AND VALIDITY THEREOF BE PLEASED TO QUASH AND SET ASIDE THE IMPUGNED ORDER IN ITA NO. 57/BANG/2024 ANNEXURE-D AS WELL AS THE IMPUGNED ORDER PASSED UNDER SECTION 154 OF THE ACT DATED 30.10.2020 IN DIN NO. CPC/1920/U7/2011214964 (ANNEXURE-B) PASSED BY THE RESPONDENT FOR THE ASSESSMENT YEAR 2019-20 AND ETC. THIS PETITION, COMING ON FOR ORDERS, THIS DAY, ORDER WAS MADE THEREIN AS UNDER: CORAM: HON'BLE MR JUSTICE S.R.KRISHNA KUMAR ORAL ORDER Learned counsel for the petitioner has filed a memo of even date, which reads as under: “The Advocate for petitioner respectfully submits that it may be permitted to withdraw the above Writ Petition and permitted to file and Income Tax Appeal before the appropriate Bench to meet the ends of justice.” 2. The said memo is placed on record. 3. Accordingly, the writ petition is dismissed as withdrawn in terms of the aforesaid memo. Sd/- (S.R.KRISHNA KUMAR) JUDGE BMC List No.: 1 Sl No.: 82