Research › Search › Judgment

Madras High Court · body

2025 DAILYLAW 208722 (MAD)

Vellaisamy v. State Of Tamilnadu Rep By Inspector Of Police, Puthanatham

CRL OP(MD)/21007/2025 · 2025-11-24

S Srimathy

Transfer Petitionbody2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

CRL OP(MD). No.21007 of 2025 BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT ( Criminal Jurisdiction ) Date : 24.11.2025 PRESENT THE HONOURABLE MRS. JUSTICE S.SRIMATHY CRL OP(MD)No.21007 of 2025 Vellaisamy ... Petitioner/ Accused No.2 Vs The State of Tamilnadu, Rep by the Inspector of Police, Puthanatham Police Station. (Crime No.244 of 2025) ... Respondent/Complainant For Petitioner : Mr.A.Joel Paul Antony For Respondent : Mr.E.Antony Sahaya Prabahar Additional Public Prosecutor PETITION FOR BAIL Under Sec.483 of BNSS PRAYER :- For Bail in Crime No.244 of 2025 on the file of the respondent police. 1/4 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis CRL OP(MD). No.21007 of 2025 ORDER : The Court made the following order :- The petitioner, who was arrested and remanded to judicial custody on 14.08.2025 for the offences punishable under Sections 310(2), 333, 127(7), 311, 351(3) and 332(b) of BNS, altered into 127(2), 310(2), 329(4) and 325 of BNS, 2023, in Crime No.244 of 2025 on the file of the respondent police, seeks bail. 2. The case of the prosecution is that on 06.08.2025, the petitioner and other accused persons robbed 9.5 sovereigns of gold and Rs.1,00,000/- from the house of the defacto complainant. Hence, the complaint. 3. The learned counsel for the petitioner submitted that the petitioner is an innocent person and he has not committed any offences as alleged by the prosecution. He further submitted that the petitioner is in judicial custody from 14.08.2025. Hence, he seeks bail to the petitioner. 4. The learned Additional Public Prosecutor submitted that the 2/4 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis CRL OP(MD). No.21007 of 2025 accused persons poisoned the dog and thereafter robbed 9.5 sovereigns of gold and Rs.1,00,000/- from the house of the defacto complainant. Therefore, he opposed the grant of bail to the petitioner. 5. Considering the facts and circumstances of the case and also considering the fact that it is a case of poisoning the dog followed by dacoity, this Court is not inclined to grant bail to the petitioner, 6. Accordingly, this Criminal Original Petition stands dismissed. (S S Y J) 24.11.2025 jbr To 1. The Inspector of Police, Puthanatham Police Station. 2. The Additional Public Prosecutor, Madurai Bench of Madras High Court, Madurai. 3/4 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis CRL OP(MD). No.21007 of 2025 S.SRIMATHY,J. jbr ORDER IN CRL OP(MD) No.21007 of 2025 Date : 24.11.2025 4/4 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis