Sukh Raj vs. State of Himachal Pradesh and another CMP No. 29177 of 2025 in Ex. Petition No.1048 of 2025 08.01.2026 Present Mr. Mehar Chand Thakur, Advocate, for the petitioner. Mr. Rajan Kahol & Mr. Vishal Panwar, Additional Advocate Generals and Mr. Ravi Chauhan & Mr. Anish Banshtu, Deputy Advocates General, for the respondents-State. While placing on record communication dated 07.01.2026, issued under the signatures of Deputy Commissioner, Kangra at Dharamshala, enclosing therewith copy of communication dated 22.12.2025, addressed to the Additional Chief Secretary-cum-FC (Revenue) to the Government of Himachal Pradesh, Mr. Rajan Kahol, learned Additional Advocate General, states that the mandate contained in the judgment sought to be executed stands duly complied with. He states that services of the petitioner have been regularized w.e.f. 08.04.2014 alongwith consequential benefits, but communication has been sent to the Government for making available the budget, enabling concerned department to pay the consequential benefits. Having perused the aforesaid communications, which are taken on record, statement made by learned Additional Advocate General appears to be correct. Since it is apparent from aforesaid communications, as detailed hereinabove, that services of the petitioner have been regularized w.e.f. 08.04.2014 alongwith consequential benefits, nothing remains to be adjudicated in the instant application and accordingly same is disposed of with a direction to the respondents to ensure that consequential benefits, if any, flowing from aforesaid compliance, if not already released, shall be released expeditiously, preferably within a period of six weeks. (Sandeep Sharma) Judge January 08, 2026 (shankar)