[2025:RJ-JP:35792-DB] HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR D.B. Civil Writ Petition No. 9584/2024 1. The Union Of India, Through The Secretary To The Government Of India, Ministry Of Defence, South Block, New Delhi. 2. Pcda (Pension), Allahabad (U.p.) 3. The Oic Records, Rvc Records, Meerut Cantt, 250001. ----Petitioners Versus No. 7232519 Ex Swr (Reservist) Om Prakash S/o Shri Sohan Lal, Aged About 76 Years, R/o Village- Majra Kalan, Post - Jhook, Tehsil And District Mahendragarh (Haryana) At Present Resident- 262-A, Ofiicer Campus, Sisri Road, Jaipur (Rajasthan). ----Respondent Connected With D.B. Civil Writ Petition No. 9590/2024 1. The Union Of India, Through The Secretary To The Government Of India, Ministry Of Defence, South Block, New Delhi. 2. Pcda (Pension), Allahabad (U.p.) 3. The Oic Records, Rvc Records, Meerut Cantt, 250001. ----Petitioners Versus No. 7232452 Ex Swr (Reservist) Lekh Ram S/o Shri Jug Lal, Aged About 77 Years, R/o Vpo-Karoli, Tehsil Kanina District- Jhajjar (Haryana) At Present Resident- H. No. 161, Prem Nagar, Jhotwara, Jaipur - 302012. ----Respondent D.B. Civil Writ Petition No. 8054/2025 1. The Union Of India, Through Secretary, Ministry Of Defence, Govt Of India, Dhq Po, New Delhi 2. The Chief Controller Of Defence Accounts (Pension), Allahabad (Up) 3. The Oic Records, Kumaon Regimental Records, Ranikhet, Uttrakhand. ----Petitioners Versus No-4154678 Ex Sep (Reservist) Rati Ram, S/o Shri Ganpat, R/o Vill- Sihal Khurd, Post-Aje Raka, Tehsil-Mundawar, [2025:RJ-JP:35792-DB] (2 of 3) [CW-9584/2024] District-Alwar (Raj.) ----Respondent For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Alok Garg, Adv. HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SANJEEV PRAKASH SHARMA HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SANJEET PUROHIT Order 08/09/2025 1. The benefit of revision of reservist pension by revision of 2/3rd of the minimum pension of regular Sepoy as per the 7th Pay Commission w.e.f. 01.01.2016 is no more an issue of res integra, as the same stands already finalized by several judgments passed by this Court, other High Courts and Armed Forces Tribunal (AFT) Pan India. The same is applicable in terms of Para 155 of the Pension Regulations for the Army, 1961. 2. The present petitions have been filed by Union of India seeking to re-agitate the matter which stands already well settled in several cases. 3. We noticed that judgments passed by AFT are in favour of the respondents. 4. In Union of India & Ors. Vs. No 2849994 Rfn (Reservist) Man Singh: D.B. Civil Writ Petition No. 7831/2025, we have taken a view that delay in challenging such orders is material. Compliance of the order relating to grant of pension of retiral benefits has to be done immediately. 5. We do not find any reason therefore to entertain these civil writ petitions at such a belated stage, hence, the same are [2025:RJ-JP:35792-DB] (3 of 3) [CW-9584/2024] dismissed with direction to release the amount as directed by the AFT along with interest @ 12% per annum. (SANJEET PUROHIT),J (SANJEEV PRAKASH SHARMA),J HEENA/MAHIMA/22