Guddati Rajeswari Raja Rajeswari, v. THE STATE OF AP
WP/19435/2020 · 2025-09-03
Venkata Jyothirmai Pratapa
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 20866 (AP) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 20866 (AP) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
APHC010293972020
IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3396] THURSDAY,THE FOURTH DAY OF SEPTEMBER TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE DR JUSTICE VENKATA JYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA
WRIT PETITION No. 19435/2020 Between:
1. GUDDATI RAJESWARI RAJA RAJESWARI, W/O.GUDDATI MURALI KRISHNA, AGED 31 YEARS, OCC: HOUSEWIFE RIO. D NO.3-51, PEDDA AMEERAM VILLAGE OF KALLA MANDAL, WEST GODAVARI DISTRICT. ...PETITIONER AND
1. THE STATE OF AP, THE STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH, REP BY ITS PRINCIPAL SECRETARY, HOME DEPARTMENT, SECRETARIT BLDGS, AMARAVATI. 2. THE SUPERINTENDENT OF POLICE, ELURU, WEST GODAVARI DISTRICT. 3. THE DY SUPERINTENDENT OF POLICE, NARSAPUR, WEST GODAVARI DISTRICT
4. THE CIRCLE INSPECTOR OF POLICE, BHIMAVARAM TOWN, WEST GODAVARI DISTRICT. 5. THE STATION HOUSE OFFICER, BHIMAVARAM II TOWN P.S.
WEST GODAVARI DISTRICT. 6. THOTA VENKAT RAVI KUMAR, S/O. SAHAEVUDU, AGED 45 YEARS, PEDDA AMEERAM VILLAGE OF KALLA MANDAL, WEST GODAVARI DISTRICT. 7. THOTA DEVI, W/O.THOTA VENKAT RAVI KUMAR, PEDDA AMEERAM VILLAGE OF KALLA MANDAL, WEST GODAVARI DISTRICT. 8. T Y K SAI TEJA, S/O.THOTA VENKAT RAVI KUMAR, PEDDA AMEERAM VILLAGE OF KALLA MANDAL, WEST GODAVARI DISTRICT. 9. ADABALA PARASURAMUDU, S/O.NOT KNOWN TO PETITIONER PEDDA AMEERAM VILLAGE OF KALLA MANDAL, WEST GODAVARI DISTRICT. 10. PATAPATI VENKAT VASURAJU, S/O.NOT KNOWN TO PETITIONER PEDDAAMEERAM VILLAGE OF KALLAMANDAL, WEST GODAVARI DISTRICT. ...RESPONDENT(S):
2
Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased to issue a writ, order or direction more particularly one in the nature of writ of Mandamus to declare the inaction of the respondents 2 to 5 in registering the crime against the unofficial respondents 6 to 10 basing on the petitioner's complaint dt.19.9.2020 which is received by the respondents is illegal, arbitrary and violative of principles of natural justice and consequently, direct the respondents 2 to 5 to register the crime against the persons mentioned in the complaint of petitioner and file charge sheet in the interest of justice and to pass
Counsel for the Petitioner:
1. YALLABANDI RAMATIRTHA Counsel for the Respondent(S):
1. GP FOR HOME
The Court made the following:
ORDER:
The instant Writ Petition is filed by the Petitioner seeking indulgence of this Court under Article 226 of the Constitution of India for the following relief:
“ ....
to issue a writ, order or direction more particularly one in the nature of writ of Mandamus to declare the inaction of the respondents 2 to 5 in registering the crime against the unofficial respondents 6 to 10 basing on the petitioner's complaint dt.19.9.2020 which is received by the respondents is illegal, arbitrary and violative of principles of natural justice and consequently, direct the respondents 2 to 5 to register the crime against the persons mentioned in the complaint of petitioner and file charge sheet in the interest of justice and to pass ....”
2. None represented for the Petitioner. 3. Sri V.Farooq, learned Assistant Government Pleader for Home, on instructions, would submit that respondent Police never received any complaint from the Petitioner and that no further orders are necessary and this Writ Petition may be disposed of by passing appropriate orders. 3
4. Considering the submission, this Writ Petition is disposed of. Petitioner is at liberty to work out her remedy according to law by making fresh representation to the concerned Police. No order as to costs. Pending applications, if any, shall stand closed. DR.JUSTICE VENKATA JYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA Mjl/*
4
HON’BLE DR. JUSTICE VENKATA JYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA
Writ Petition No. 19435 of 2020
04.09.2025
Mjl /*