Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Rajasthan · body

2025 DAILYLAW 20864 (RAJ)

DURGA NARAYAN CHOUDHARY AND ORS v. STATE OF RAJASTHAN AND ANR

CRLMP/1741/2017 · 2025-07-31

Praveer Bhatnagar

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

[2025:RJ-JP:29197] HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous (Petition) No. 1741/2017 1. Durga Narayan Choudhary Son Of Vijay Lal Choudhary, aged about 55 years 2. Sumitra Wife Of Durga Narayan Choudhary, aged about 50 years Both are R/o House No.24, Govind Vatika, Near Khole Ke Hanumanji Temple, Delhi Bye Pass, P.s. Galta Gate, Jaipur. 3. Prabhu Dayal Son Of Hanuman Sahai, aged about 55 years R/o House No.1344, Balanand Ji Ka Rasta, Chandpole, Jaipur ----Petitioners Versus 1. State Of Rajasthan Through P.p. 2. Smt. Pooja Choudhary D/o Mahendra Singh Choudhary, aged about 26 years, R/o 648, Sumer Nagar, Kalyanpura, New Sanganer Road, Jaipur. ----Respondents For Petitioner(s) : None Present For Respondent(s) : Mr. Shree Ram Dhakar, PP HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE PRAVEER BHATNAGAR Order 31/07/2025 None Present for the petitioner. Learned Public Prosecutor has submitted the factual report. The same is taken on record. The factual report shows that the charge-sheet in the present case has already been proposed way back in the year 2019. It is presumed that the trial must have been proceeded. [2025:RJ-JP:29197] (2 of 2) [CRLMP-1741/2017] In light of the factual report, no case is made out for quashing the FIR, accordingly, the instant criminal misc. petition stands dismissed. All pending applications, if any, also stand disposed of. (PRAVEER BHATNAGAR),J ashu /51