VINOD KUMAR MEENA v. THE UNION OF INDIA AND 8 ORS.
WP(C)/6317/2023 · 2025-01-26
Soumitra Saikia
Writ Petition (Civil)body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 20861 (GAU) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 20861 (GAU) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
Page No.# 1/3 GAHC010242782023
undefined
THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT (HIGH COURT OF ASSAM, NAGALAND, MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH) Case No. : WP(C)/6317/2023 VINOD KUMAR MEENA S/O BABU LAL MEENA, ADDRESS FOR COMMUNICATION- 1ST BATELLION, RAILWAY PROTECTION SPECIAL FORCE, LUMDING, KARBI ANGLONG, ASSAM, PIN-
782447. VERSUS THE UNION OF INDIA AND 8 ORS. TO BE REP. BY THE SECRETARY TO THE GOVT. OF INDIA, MINISTRY OF RAILWAYS, RAIL BHAVAN, RAISINA ROAD, NEW DELHI, PIN- 110001.
2:THE RAILWAY BOARD TO BE REP. BY ITS CHAIRMAN RAIL BHAVAN RAISINA ROAD NEW DELHI PIN- 110001.
3:THE DIRECTOR/RPF RAILWAY BOARD RAIL BHAVAN RAISINA ROAD NEW DELHI PIN- 110001. 4:DIG(ESTABLISHMENT) RAILWAY BOARD RAIL BHAVAN RAISINA ROAD NEW DELHI PIN- 110001.
Page No.# 2/3 5:THE DIRECTOR GENERAL OF RAILWAY PROTECTION FORCE RAIL BHAVAN RAISINA ROAD NEW DELHI PIN- 110001.
6:THE PRINCIPAL CHIEF SECURITY COMMISSIONER NORTHEAST FRONTIER RAILWAY MALIGAON GUWAHATI- 781011 ASSAM.
7:THE APPELLATE AUTHORITY CUM CHIEF SECURITY COMMISSIONER RAILWAY PROTECTION SPECIAL FORCE RAILWAY BOARD RAIL BHAVAN RAISINA ROAD NEW DELHI PIN- 110001.
8:THE DISCIPLINARY OFFICER CUM COMMANDANT 4TH BATELLION RAILWAY PROPTECTION SPECIAL FORCE NEW JALPAIGURI SILIGURI WEST BENGAL PIN- 735101.
9:THE ENQUIRY OFFICER CUM COMPANY COMMANDANT B COMPANY 4TH BATELLION RAILWAY PROPTECTION SPECIAL FORCE NEW JALPAIGURI SILIGURI WEST BENGAL PIN- 735101 Advocate for the Petitioner : MR I RAFIQUE, MS. R. R. SAIKIA,MS A AFREEN,MRS S A CHOUDHURY Advocate for the Respondent : DY.S.G.I., MR H GUPTA
Page No.# 3/3 BEFORE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SOUMITRA SAIKIA ORDER 27.01.2025
Mr. I. Rafique, learned counsel for the petitioner on instructions submits that the writ petitioner does not wish to press this writ petition any further. Mr. H. Gupta, learned CGC appears for the respondents. Accordingly, the writ petition stands dismissed as not pressed. Interim order, if any, stands vacated. Pending Interlocutory application, if any, also stands dismissed. JUDGE Comparing Assistant