Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Karnataka · body

2025 DAILYLAW 2086 (KAR)

SRI V MARANAIKA v. SMT. PALAKKA

RP/93/2025 · 2026-04-17

V Srishananda

Review Petitionbody2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

- 1 - HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC:50283 RP No. 93 of 2025 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 2ND DAY OF DECEMBER, 2025 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE V SRISHANANDA REVIEW PETITION NO. 93 OF 2025 BETWEEN: 1. SRI V MARANAIKA AGED ABOUT 80 YEARS, S/O. ERAIAH, AGRICULTURIST 2. SRI.BOMMALLAH AGED ABOUT 61 YEARS, S/O. ERAIAH, AGRICULTURIST 3. SRI. BANGURA NINGALAH AGED ABOUT 51 YEARS, S/O. ERAIAH, AGRICULTURIST, ALL ARE RESIDENTS OF SULENAHALLY VILLAGE, MOLAKALMURU TALUK, CHITRADURGA DISTRICT - 577 535. …PETITIONERS (BY SRI. BALARAJ A.C., ADVOCATE) AND: 1. SMT. PALAKKA W/O. LATE SANNA BORAIAH, AGED ABOUT 66 YEARS, AGRICULTURIST, Digitally signed by SHARADAVANI B Location: High Court of Karnataka - 2 - HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC:50283 RP No. 93 of 2025 R/OF. SULENAHALLY VILLAGE, MOLAKALMURU TALUK, CHITRADURGA DISTRICT - 577 535 2. SMT. GOWRAKKA, W/O.PALAIAH, AGED ABOUT 59 YEARS, R/O. DODDMNANDALABATTY @ RAMADURGA, CHALLAKERE TALUK. CHITRADURGA DISTRICT PIN - 577 522. 3. SRI. BAJJE MALLAIAH, S/O. KENGA PALAIAH, AGED ABOUT 81 YEARS, AGRICULTURIST, R/OF. SULENAHALLI VILLAGE, MOLAKALMURU TALUK, CHITRADURGA DISTRICT, PIN - 577 535 …RESPONDENTS THIS REVIEW PETITION IS FILED UNDER SECTION 114 READ WITH ORDER 47 RULE 1 OF CPC 1908, PRAYING TO SET ASIDE THE JUDGMENT PASSED IN RFA 757/2015 AND TO GRANT THE RELIEF AS PRAYED IN THE ABOVE REGULAR APPEAL BY SETTING ASIDE THE JUDGMENT AND DECREE DATED 19.03.2015 IN OS.NO.11/2014 PASSED BY THE HONBLE SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE AND JMFC, CHALLAKERE, CHITRADURGA DISTRICT AND CONSEQUENTLY DISMISS THE SUIT. - 3 - HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC:50283 RP No. 93 of 2025 THIS PETITION, COMING ON FOR ORDERS, THIS DAY, ORDER WAS MADE THEREIN AS UNDER: CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE V SRISHANANDA ORAL ORDER Sri. A.C. Balaraj, learned counsel for the petitioners submits that the petitioner is not cooperating to cure the objections. Placing his submission on record, Review Petition stands dismissed for non-prosecution. Sd/- (V SRISHANANDA) JUDGE SNC List No.: 1 Sl No.: 16 CT-SG