APHC010293832020 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3233] SATURDAY, THE THIRTIETH DAY OF AUGUST TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE B KRISHNA MOHAN WRIT PETITION NO: 19506/2020 Between: 1. VELLELA GOWRI SHANKER REDDY,, S/O V.JAYARAMI REDDY, AGED ABOUT 47 YEARS, OCC BUSINESS , R/O. DOOR NO.1/2724- B45, HOUSING BOARD COLONY, YERRAMUKKAPALLI, KADAPA CITY, YSR DISTRICT ...PETITIONER AND 1. THE STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH, REP., BY ITS PRINCIPAL SECRETARY, REVENUE DEPARTMENT, SECRETARIAT BUILDINGS, VELAGAPUDI, AMARAVATHI, GUNTUR DISTRICT. 2. THE DISTRICT COLLECTOR, YSR DISTRICT, KADAPA. 3. THE REVENUE DIVISIONAL OFFICER, KADAPA REVENUE DIVISION, Y.S.R. DISTRICT. 4. THE TAHSILDHAR, KADAPA MANDAL, YSR DISTRICT. ...RESPONDENT(S): Counsel for the Petitioner: 1. V R REDDY KOVVURI Counsel for the Respondent(S): 1. GP FOR REVENUE 2 HBKM,J W.P.No.19506 of 2020 The Court made the following Order: Heard the learned counsel for the petitioner and the learned Assistant Government Pleader for the respondents. 2. This writ petition was filed questioning the action of the 4th respondent in attempting to take possession of the land in an extent of Ac.0.18 cents out of Ac.4.99 cents in Sy.No.550 of Chemmu Miyapet, Kadapa Municipal Corporation, Kadapa Mandal, YSR District belonging to the petitioner on the ground that it is required for construction of the Primary Health Care Center without following the due process of law. 3. On the other hand, the learned Assistant Government Pleader relying upon the counter of the 4th respondent submits that it is only the allegation and apprehension of the petitioner, but there is no proposal to construct the Primary Health Center in the subject land. It is not under consideration for the respondents to raise the alleged Primary Health Center in the subject land. 4. In view of the above said facts and circumstances, as there is no attempt by the respondents as alleged by the petitioner, no further orders are necessary in this matter. However, if so warranted for any public purpose, the respondent Nos.2 to 4 are directed to deal with the subject land strictly in accordance with law. 5. Accordingly, this Writ Petition is disposed of. Interim order, if any, deemed to have been vacated. There shall be no order as to costs. 3 HBKM,J W.P.No.19506 of 2020 As a sequel, Interlocutory Applications pending, if any, shall stand closed. __________________________ JUSTICE B. KRISHNA MOHAN 30.08.2025 PGT