APHC010294332020 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3396] THURSDAY,THE FOURTH DAY OF SEPTEMBER TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE DR JUSTICE VENKATA JYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA WRIT PETITION NO: 19451/2020 Between: 1. K.M.NOOR MOHAMMED KHAN,, AGED 39 YRS S/O K.M.MUNWAR KHAN R/O D.NO.2-273, KAGGALLU, HINDUPURMANDAL, HINDUPUR ANANTAPURAMU DISTRICT- 515201 ...PETITIONER AND 1. THE STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH, DEPARTMENT OF HOME SECRETARIAT COMPLEX, VELAGAPUDI, AMARAVATHI. REP BY ITS PRINCIPAL SECRETARY. 2. THE SUPERINTENDENT OF POLICE, ANANTAPUR DISTRICT ANANTAPUR. 3. THE CIRCLE INSPECTOR OF POLICE, HINDUPUR I TOWN P.S HINDUPUR, ANANTAPURAMU DISTRICT 4. THE STATION HOUSE OFFICER, HINDUPUR I TOWN P.S HINDUPTZ, ANANTAPURAMU DISTRICT 5. IRSHADAHAMMED, S/O. S.ALLABAKSH AGED NOT KNOWN R/O D.NO. 3-6-6, MUKKADIPETA,HINDUPUR TOWN ANANTAPURAMU DISTRICT -515201 ...RESPONDENT(S): Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased to pass an order or direction or any other proceedings one in the nature of Writ of Mandamus declaring the action of the 3rd respondent in calling the petitioner to the police station and threatening and coercing the petitioner to return of the gold to the 5th respondent at the rate purchased in the year 2018 and also taking signatures on blank and printed papers as illegal, arbitrary and without jurisdiction and in violation of principals of natural justice and violation of the petitioners rights guarantee under Article 14 and 21 of the Constitution of India and consequently direct the respondents not to interfere with the petitioner's rights and liberties and return the papers on which signatures of the petitioner was obtained by force and pass 2 Counsel for the Petitioner: 1. HARISH KUMAR RASINENI Counsel for the Respondent(S): 1. GP FOR HOME The Court made the following: ORDER: The instant Writ Petition is filed by the Petitioner seeking indulgence of this Court under Article 226 of the Constitution of India for the following relief: “ .... to pass an order or direction or any other proceedings one in the nature of Writ of Mandamus declaring the action of the 3rd respondent in calling the petitioner to the police station and threatening and coercing the petitioner to return of the gold to the 5th respondent at the rate purchased in the year 2018 and also taking signatures on blank and printed papers as illegal, arbitrary and without jurisdiction and in violation of principals of natural justice and violation of the petitioners rights guarantee under Articles 14 and 21 of the Constitution of India and consequently direct the respondents not to interfere with the petitioner's rights and liberties and return the papers on which signatures of the petitioner was obtained by force and pass ....” 2. Sri V.Farooq, learned Assistant Government Pleader for Home appearing for respondent Police on instructions would submit that the Police never interfered in the civil disputes between the parties and that this Writ Petition may be disposed of by passing appropriate orders. 3. Learned counsel for the Petitioner would submit that recording the said submission, this Writ Petition may be disposed of. 4. Considering the submissions, this Writ Petition is disposed of. No order as to costs. Pending applications, if any, shall stand closed. DR.JUSTICE VENKATA JYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA Mjl/* 3 HON’BLE DR. JUSTICE VENKATA JYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA Writ Petition No. 19451 of 2020 04.09.2025 Mjl /* 4