Research › Search › Judgment

Allahabad High Court · body

2025 DAILYLAW 20850 (ALL)

GOLU AGRAWAL ALIAS HARIGOVIND KUMAR v. STATE OF U.P.

BAIL/7195/2025 · 2025-04-07

Mohd Azhar Husain Idrisi

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

Neutral Citation No. - 2025:AHC:51017 Court No. - 83 Case :- CRIMINAL MISC. BAIL APPLICATION No. - 7195 of 2025 Applicant :- Golu Agrawal Alias Harigovind Kumar Opposite Party :- State of U.P. Counsel for Applicant :- Dhirendra Kumar Srivastava,Satish Chandra Singh Counsel for Opposite Party :- G.A. Hon'ble Mohd. Azhar Husain Idrisi,J. 1. Heard learned counsel for the applicant and learned AGA for the State. Perused the record. 2. The instant bail application has been filed on behalf of the applicant - Golu Agrawal Alias Harigovind Kumar, with a prayer to release him on bail in Case Crime No. 118 of 2024, under Section 364 IPC, Police Station Alinagar, District Chandauli. 3. It is argued by the learned counsel for the applicant that the applicant is absolutely innocent and has been falsely implicated in the present case. It is further argued that applicant was not named in the FIR and the FIR was lodged after two days of the incident. The role of 'marpeet is not attributed to the applicant. No demand of ransom was made by applicant. It is next argued that there is no cogent evidence against the applicant connecting him in the present offence. It is pointed out that co-accused Amrit Singh and Nihal Singh have been granted bail by the coordinate Bench of this Court vide orders dated 10.9.2024 & 19.9.2024 in Criminal Misc. Bail Application Nos. 29300 of 2024 & 34645 of 2024. The applicant having no criminal history to his credit and having scanty chances of his fleeing away from the judicial process and tampering the prosecution evidence, deserves to be released on bail. 4. Learned A.G.A. opposed the prayer for bail but could not dispute the aforesaid facts as argued by the learned counsel for the applicant. 5. Considering the submissions of the learned counsel for the parties and the fact that co-accused Amrit Singh and Nihal Singh have already been granted bail by the coordinate Bench of this Court, without expressing any opinion on the final merits of the case, let the applicant-Golu Agrawal Alias Harigovind Kumar involved in the aforesaid crime be released on bail, on his furnishing a personal bond and two sureties each in the like amount to the satisfaction of the court concerned with the following conditions that :- i). The applicant will not pressurize/intimidate the prosecution witnesses and co-operate in the trial. ii). The applicant will appear regularly on each and every date fixed by the trial court unless his personal appearance is exempted through counsel by the court concerned. In breach of any condition enumerated above, the trial court shall be at liberty to treat it as abuse of liberty of bail and pass appropriate orders in accordance with law. Order Date :- 8.4.2025 M. Tarik Digitally signed by :- MOHD TARIK High Court of Judicature at Allahabad