APHC010293932018 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3368] WEDNESDAY, THE THIRD DAY OF SEPTEMBER TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE B V L N CHAKRAVARTHI WRIT PETITION NO: 13334/2018 Between: 1. M.S. SUDHAKAR SHARMA, AGED ABOUT 59 YEARS, OCC-RETIRED ACCOUNTS OFFICER IN ANANTHAPURAMU DISTRICT CO-OP. MARKETING SOCIETY LIMITED, RIO. 5-139-12, OPP. PANCHAYAT OFFICE, CHERUVU ROAD, PENUKONDA, PENUKONDA MANDAL, ANANTHAPURAMU DISTRICT, ANDHRA PRADESH STATE ...PETITIONER AND 1. STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH, REPRESENTED BY ITS PRINCIPAL SECRETARY, CO-OPERATION DEPARTMENT, SECRETARIAT AT VELAGAPUDI, AMARAVATHI, GUNTUR DISTRICT. 2. THE ANANTHAPURAMU DISTRICT COOP, MARKETING SOCIETY LIMITED, REPRESENTED BY ITS PRESIDENT, ANANTHAPURAMU, ANANTHAPURAMU DISTRICT, ANDHRA PRADESH STATE. 3. THE ANANTHAPURAMU DISTRICT COOP, MARKETING SOCIETY LIMITED, REPRESENTED BY ITS BUSINESS MANAGER, ANANTHAPURAMU, ANANTHAPURAMU DISTRICT, ANDHRA PRADESH STATE. ...RESPONDENT(S): 2 Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased to issue an appropriate writ, or order or direction, more particularly, one in the nature of Writ of Mandamus, declaring the inaction on the part of the 2nd respondent in not considering the representation of the petitioner dated 22-08-2017 for reinstatement into service in pursuance of G.O. Ms No. 138, Finance (HRIV-FR), dated 08-08-2017 issued by the Government of Andhra Pradesh as highly illegal, arbitrary and unconstitutional being violative of Articles 14 and 21 of the Constitution of India and also violative of principles of natural justice and consequently direct the 2nd respondent herein to reinstate the petitioner into service by considering his representation dated 22-08-2017, in the interest of justice and pass IA NO: 1 OF 2018 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to direct the 2nd respondent herein to reinstate the petitioner into service by considering his representation dated 22-08-2017, pending disposal of the main writ petition, in the interest of justice and pass Counsel for the Petitioner: 1. K SRINIVAS Counsel for the Respondent(S): 1. GP FOR COOPERATION (AP) 2. C V R RUDRA PRASAD 3 THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE B.V.L.N. CHAKRAVARTHI WRIT PETITION NO: 13334 of 2018 The Court made the following Order: Sri K.Srinivas, learned counsel for the petitioner would submit that the sole writ petitioner is no more and hence, no further orders are required to be passed in the present Writ Petition. 2. Learned Additional Government Pleader representing the State is in attendance. 3. Recording the submission made by learned counsel for the petitioner, this Writ Petition is closed. No order as to costs. Interlocutory applications, if any, pending shall stand closed. ______________________________ JUSTICE B.V.L.N. CHAKRAVARTHI Dated: 03.09.2025 PSA 4 THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE B.V.L.N. CHAKRAVARTHI WRIT PETITION NO: 13334 of 2018 Date: 03.09.2025 PSA