Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Andhra Pradesh · body

2025 DAILYLAW 20842 (AP)

K.Bhaskara Rao, v. The Andhra Pradesh Education and Welfare Infrastructure Development Corporation,

WP/13311/2018 · 2025-07-29

B V L N Chakravarthi

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

APHC010293532018 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3368] WEDNESDAY, THE THIRTIETH DAY OF JULY TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE B V L N CHAKRAVARTHI WRIT PETITION NO: 13311/2018 Between: 1. K.BHASKARA RAO,, S/O. SIMHACHALAM, AGED ABOUT 54 YEARS, EXECUTIVE ENGINEER (I/C.), ANDHRA PRADESH EDUCATION AND WELFARE INFRASTRUCTURE DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION, TARAKARAMA SANKSHEMA BHAVAN, DRDA COMPLEX, SRIKAKULAM. ...PETITIONER AND 1. THE ANDHRA PRADESH EDUCATION AND WELFARE INFRASTRUCTURE DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION, REP. BY ITS MANAGING DIRECTOR, D.NO. 5-6-59/6/1, CHITTINAGAR, LAMBADIPETA, VIJAYAWADA, KRISHNA DISTRICT-520001. 2. PRL SECY SCHOOL EDUCATION DEPT STATE OF A P, THE GOVT. OF A.P. REP. BY ITS PRINCIPAL SECRETARY, SCHOOL EDUCATION DEPARTMENT, SECRETARIAT AT VELAGAPUDI, GUNTUR DISTRICT- 522001. ...RESPONDENT(S): Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased to issue a writ in the nature of Mandamus or any other appropriate writ, order or direction, by declaring the action of the respondents in not considering the claim of the petitioner for promotion to the post of Executive 2 Engineer on the ground that the Crime was registered against him, though neither Charge Sheet nor Charge Memo was issued, as illegal, arbitrary and unconstitutional being violative of Articles 14 and 16 of Constitution of India and consequently direct the respondents to consider the case of the petitioner for promotion to the post of Executive Engineer without reference to F.I.R. in Cr.No.10/RCA-ACB/CIU/AP-Hyd/2016, u/secs. 13(2) r/w 13(1) (e) of P.C. Act 1988, dt.27-6-2016, in terms of G.O.Ms.No.66, General Administration (Services.C) Department, dt.30-1-1991 and on the analogy of orders granted by this Honble Court in similar cases and promote him as such, with all consequential benefits and to pass IA NO: 1 OF 2018 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased To direct the respondents to consider the case of the petitioner for promotion to the post of Executive Engineer without reference to F.I.R. in Cr.No.10/RCA-ACB/CIU/AP-Hyd/2016, u/secs.13(2) r/w 13(1) (e) of P.C. Act 1988, dt. 27-6-2016, in terms of G.O.Ms.No.66, General Administration (Services.C) Dept., dt.30-1-1991 and on the analogy of orders granted by this Hon'ble Court in similar cases and promote him as such, pending final disposal of the main W.P., and to pass Counsel for the Petitioner: 1. S GOPAL RAO Counsel for the Respondent(S): 1. GP FOR SCHOOL EDUCATION (AP) 2. G V S KISHORE KUMAR 3 THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE B.V.L.N. CHAKRAVARTHI WRIT PETITION NO: 13311 of 2018 The Court made the following Order: Sri S.Gopal Rao, learned counsel for the petitioner would submit that the cause in the present Writ Petition does not survive for further adjudication. 2. Learned Additional Government Pleader for Home is in attendance. 3. Recording the submission made by learned counsel for the petitioner, this Writ Petition is dismissed as infructuous. No order as to costs. Interlocutory applications, if any, pending shall stand closed. ______________________________ JUSTICE B.V.L.N. CHAKRAVARTHI Dated: 30.07.2025 PSA 4 THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE B.V.L.N. CHAKRAVARTHI WRIT PETITION NO: 13311 of 2018 Date: 30.07.2025 PSA