Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Jammu and Kashmir · body

2025 DAILYLAW 2084 (JK)

ABDUL HAKIM v. STATE TH.TOURISM AND CULTURE AND ORS.

SWP/1275/2013 · 2025-03-07

Wasim Sadiq Nargal

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

HIGH COURT OF JAMMU & KASHMIR AND LADAKH HIGH COURT OF JAMMU & KASHMIR AND LADAKH AT JAMMU Case:- SWP No. 1275/2013 Abdul Hakim …..Appellant(s)/Petitioner(s) Through: Mr. R.P Sharma, Advocate Vs State and Ors. .…. Respondent(s) Through: Mr. Rajesh Thappa, Dy. A.G Coram: HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE WASIM SADIQ NARGAL, JUDGE ORDER (07.03.2025) The instant petition has come up before this Court after 12 years and during this intervening period, there is no effort being made on the part of the petitioner to get the instant petition listed, thus, an inference can be drawn that the instant petition has been rendered infructuous and the petitioner has lost interest in prosecution of this petition. The instant petition is, accordingly, dismissed for non-prosecution. However, the petitioner can seek appropriate remedy, if cause of action still survives. (WASIM SADIQ NARGAL) JUDGE JAMMU 07.03.2025 Tarun S. No. 80