ABDUL HAKIM v. STATE TH.TOURISM AND CULTURE AND ORS.
SWP/1275/2013 · 2025-03-07
Wasim Sadiq Nargal
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 2084 (JK) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 2084 (JK) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
HIGH COURT OF JAMMU & KASHMIR AND LADAKH
HIGH COURT OF JAMMU & KASHMIR AND LADAKH AT JAMMU
Case:- SWP No. 1275/2013
Abdul Hakim …..Appellant(s)/Petitioner(s)
Through: Mr. R.P Sharma, Advocate
Vs
State and Ors. .…. Respondent(s)
Through: Mr. Rajesh Thappa, Dy. A.G
Coram:
HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE WASIM SADIQ NARGAL, JUDGE
ORDER (07.03.2025)
The instant petition has come up before this Court after 12 years and during this intervening period, there is no effort being made on the part of the petitioner to get the instant petition listed, thus, an inference can be drawn that the instant petition has been rendered infructuous and the petitioner has lost interest in prosecution of this petition.
The instant petition is, accordingly, dismissed for non-prosecution. However, the petitioner can seek appropriate remedy, if cause of action still survives.
(WASIM SADIQ NARGAL) JUDGE JAMMU
07.03.2025
Tarun
S. No. 80