APHCOI0292852022 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) SMB >1 MONDAY,THE THIRTIETH DAY OF JUNE TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE T.C.D.SEKHAR WRIT PETITION NQ: 17322 OF 2022 Between: Adari Praveena,, W/o. Nagesh Babu Adari, Aged about 45 years, R/o. ! 1920 Manor View, Gumming, Georgia, USA 30041., appointed GPA Holder, Adari Prasad Babu, S/o. Raji Babu Adari, Aged about 40 years, R/o. D. No. 3-92, KJ Puram, Madugula Mandal, Visakhapatnam - 531 028. ...Petitioner AND 1. The State of Andhra Pradesh, Rep. by its Principal Secretary, Stamps and Registration Department, Secretariat Buildings, Velagapudi, Amaravathi, Guntur District, Andhra Pradesh. 2. The Director General of Police, Andhra Pradesh Police Head Quarters, Mangalagiri, Guntur District. 3. The District Registrar, Vijayawada, Krishna District. 4. The Sub Registrar, Patamata, Vijayawada, Krishna District. 5. Yellapu Srihari, S/o. Yellapu Subramanyam, Aged about 45 years, R/o. Patamata, Vijayawada, Krishna District. ...Respondents Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased to declare the action of the respondents particularly 4th respondent in registering and executing the sale deed documents vide Document No. 6056 of 2016 dated 22.06.2016 over the house property in SY No. 47/30 Admeasuring in an extent of 365.34 Sq Yds, Document No.5563 of 2016 dated 10.08.2016, admeasuring an extent of 60.89 Sq. yds. Document No.5888 of 2016, admeasuring an extent of 42.2/3 Sq. yds. Document No.5889 of 2016, admeasuring an extent of 121.78 Sq. yds which is situated at Sivajipalem, Visakhapatnam City, Visakhapatnam District., by producing a copy of fake General Power of Attorney as illegal, arbitrary, high handed, ultra vires, contrary to the Andhra Pradesh Registration Act, 1908 and against to the principles of natural justice apart from being violative of Article 300-A of the Constitution of India and consequently direct the respondents particularly 4th respondent to cancel the execution of registered sale deed documents vide Document No. 6056 of 2016 dated 22.06.2016 over the house property in SY No. 47/30 Admeasuring in an extent of 365.34 Sq Yds, Document No.5563 of 2016 dated 10.08.2016, admeasuring an extent of 60.89 Sq. yds, Document No.5888 of 2016, admeasuring an extent of 42.2/3 Sq. yds. Document No.5889 of 2016, admeasuring an extent of 121.78 Sq. yds which is situated at Sivajipalem, Visakhapatnam City, Visakhapatnam District. Prayer is amended as per the Court’s Order dated 30.06.2025 in lA No. I 1/2025 in Writ Petition and affidavit. lA NO: 1 OF 2022 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to direct the respondents to set aside the execution of registered sale deed document vide Document No. 6056 of 2016 dated 22.06.2016 over the house proper!^ in SY No. 47/30 Admeasuring in an extent of 365.34 Sq Yds which is situated at Sivajipalem, Visakhapatnam City, Visakhapatnam District., until further orders by considering the representation submitted to the 4th respondent pending disposal of the Writ petition. .4 lA NO: 1 OF 2023 Petition under Section 151 CPG praying that in the circumstances seated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to direct the respondents not to proceed further in respect of the , land admeasuring an extent of 365.34 Sq yds in Sy.47/30 situated at Sivajipaslem, Visakhapatnam, Visakhapatnam District by considering the representation dated 11-12-2020 of he petitioner pending disposal of the present writ petition. Counsel for the Petitioner: SRI NANI BABU ROBBA Counsel for the Respondent No. 2: GP FOR HOME Counsel for the Respondent Nos. 1,3 and 4:GP FOR REGISTRATION AND STAMPS Counsel for the Respondent No. 5: SRI P NARAHARI BABU The Court made the following order: 1 TCCff,] W.P.No.17322 of 2022 APHC010292852022 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) mm [3505] >.“j MONDAY, THE THIRTIETH DAY OF JUNE TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE T.C.D.SEKHAR WRIT PETITION NO: 17322/2022 Between: 1.ADARI PRAVEENA,, W/0. NAGESH BABU ADARI, AGED ABOUT 45 YEARS, R/0. 1920 MANOR VIEW, GUMMING, GEORGIA, USA 30041., APPOINTED GPA HOLDER, ADARI PRASAD BABU, S/0. RAJI BABU ADARI,. AGED ABOUT 40 YEARS, R/0. D. NO. 3-92, KJ PURAM, MADUGULA MANUAL, VISAKHAPATNAM - 531 028. ...PETITIONER AND 1.THE STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH, REP. BY ITS PRINCIPAL STAMPS AND REGISTRATION DEPARTMENT, BUILDINGS, SECRETARY, SECRETARIAT GUNTUR DISTRICT, ANDHRA PRADESH. VELAGAPUDI, AMARAVATHI, 2.THE DIRECTOR GENERAL OF POLICE, ANDHRA PRADESH POLICE HEAD QUARTERS, MANGALAGIRI, GUNTUR DISTRICT. 3.THE DISTRICT REGISTRAR, VIJAYAWADA, KRISHNA DISTRICT. 4.TI^E SUB REGISTRAR, PATAMATA, VIJAYAWADA, KRISHNA DISTRICT. 5.YELLAPU SRIHARI, S/0. YELLAPU SUBRAMANYAM, AGED ABOUT 45 YEARS, R/0. PATAMATA, VIJAYAWADA, KRISHNA DISTRICT. AGED ABOUT 40 YEARS, R/0. D. NO. 3-92, KJ PURAM, MADUGULA MANUAL, VISAKHAPATNAM - 531 028. ...PETITIONER AND 1.THE STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH, REP. BY ITS PRINCIPAL STAMPS AND REGISTRATION DEPARTMENT, BUILDINGS, SECRETARY, SECRETARIAT GUNTUR DISTRICT, ANDHRA PRADESH. VELAGAPUDI, AMARAVATHI, 2.THE DIRECTOR GENERAL OF POLICE, ANDHRA PRADESH POLICE HEAD QUARTERS, MANGALAGIRI, GUNTUR DISTRICT. 3.THE DISTRICT REGISTRAR, VIJAYAWADA, KRISHNA DISTRICT. 4.TI^E SUB REGISTRAR, PATAMATA, VIJAYAWADA, KRISHNA DISTRICT. 5.YELLAPU SRIHARI, S/0. YELLAPU SUBRAMANYAM, AGED ABOUT 45 YEARS, R/0. PATAMATA, VIJAYAWADA, KRISHNA DISTRICT. ^ ...RESPONDENT{S): Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased topleased to issue an appropriate writ, order or direction, more particularly one in the nature of writ of Mandamus, declaringthe action of the respondents particularly 4th respondent in registering and executing the sale 2 TCDS,J W.P.No.17322 of2022 deed document vide Document No. 6056 of 2016 dated 22.06.2016 over the house property in SY No. 47/30 Admeasuring in an extent of 365.34 $q Yds which is situated atSivajipalem, Visakhapatnam City, Visakhapatnam District., by producing a copy of fake General Power of Attorney as illegal, arbitrary, high handed, ultra vires, contrary to the Andhra Pradesh Registration Act, 1908 and against to the principles of natural justiceapart from being violative of Article 300-A of the Constitution of Indiaand consequently direct the respondents particularly 4th respondent to cancel the execution of registered sale deed document vide Document No. 6056 of 2016 dated 22.06.2016 over the house property in SY No. 47/30 Admeasuring in an extent of 365.34 Sq Yds which is situated atSivajipalem, Visakhapatnam City, Visakhapatnam District., and be pleased to pass lA NO: 1 OF 2022 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased pleased to direct the respondents to set aside the execution of registered sale deed document vide Document No. 6056 of 2016 dated 22.06.2016 over the house property in SY No. 47/30 Admeasuring in an extent of 365.34 Sq Yds which is situated atSivajipalem, Visakhapatnam City, Visakhapatnam District., until further orders by considering the representation submitted to the 4th responden pending disposal of the Writ petition, and to pass lA NO: 1 OF 2023 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased Pleased to direct the respondents not to proceed further in respect of the land admeasuring an extent of 365.34 Sq yds in Sy.47/30 situated at Sivajipaslem, Visakhapatnam, Visakhapatnam District by considering the representation dated 11-12-2020 of he petitioner pending disposal of the present writ petition and to pass lA NO: 1 OF 2025 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased may be pleased to permit the petitioners to amend the prayer instead of "To declare the action of the respondents particularly 4th respondent in registering and executing the sale deed document vide Document Nq. 6056 of 2016 dated 22.06.2016 over the house property in SY No. 47/30 Admeasuring in an extent of 365.34 Sq Yds which is situated at Sivajipalem, Visakhapatnam City, Visakhapatnam District., by producing a copy of fake General Power of Attorney as illegal, arbitrary, high handed, ultra vires, contrary to the Andhra Pradesh Registration Act, 1908 and against to the principles of natural justice apart from being violative of Article 300- A of the 3 TCDS,J W.P. No. 17322 of 2022 Constitution of India and consequently direct the respondents particularly 4th respondent to cancel the execution of registered sale deed document vide Document No. 6056 of 2016 dated 22.06.2016 over the house property in SY No. 47/30 Admeasuring in an extent of 365.34 Sq Yds which is situated at Sivajip^lem, Visakhapatnam City, Visakhapatnam District., and be pleased to pass such other relief or reliefs as this Hon'ble Court deems fit and proper in the interest of justice and in the circumstances of the case" as "To declare the action of the respondents particularly 4' respondent in registering and executing the sale deed documents vide Document No. 6056 of 2016 dated 22.06.2016 over the house property in SY No. 47/30 Admeasuring in an extent of 365.34 Sq Yds, Document No.5563 of 2016 dated 10.08.2016, admeasuring an extent of 60.89 Sq. yds, Document No.5888 of 2016, admeasuring an extent of 42.2/3 Sq. yds. Document No.5889 of 2016, admeasuring an extent of 121.78 Sq. yds which is situated at Sivajipalem, Visakhapatnam City, Visakhapatnam District., by producing a copy of fake General Power of Attorney as illegal, arbitrary, high handed, ultra vires, contrary to the Andhra Pradesh Registration Act, 1908 and against to the principles of natural justice apart from being violative of Article 300-A of the Constitution of India and consequently direct the respondents particularly 4th respondent to cancel the execution of registered sale deed documents vide Document No. 6056 of 2016 dated 22.06.2016 over the house property in SY No. 47/30 Admeasuring in an extent of 365.34 Sq Yds, Document No.5563 of 2016 dated 10.08.2016, admeasuring an extent of 60.89 Sq. yds. Document No.5888 of 2016, admeasuring an extent of 42.2/3 Sq. yds. Document No.5889 of 2016, admeasuring an extent of 121.78 Sq. yds which is situated at Sivajipalem, Visakhapatnam City, Visakhapatnam District., and be pleased to pass Counsel for the Petitioner: 1.NANI BABU ROBBA Counsel for the Respondent(S): 1.GP FOR HOME 2.GP FOR REGISTRATION AND STAMPS (AP) 3.P NARAHARI BABU 4 TCDS,J W.P. No. 17322 of2022 The Court made the following order: Learned counsel for the petitioner addressed a letter dated 29.06.2025 I to the Registry, seeking permission of this Court to withdraw the writ petition. 2. The said letter is placed on record. 3. Permission is accorded. 4. Accordingly, the Writ Petition is dismissed as withdrawn reserving liberty to avail other remedies available under law. There shall be no order as to costs. As a sequel, pending applications, if any, shall stand closed. Sd/- G.HELA NAIDU ASSISTANT REGISTRAR //TRUE COPY// S N OFFICER To, 1. One CC to Sri. Nani Babu Robba Advocate [OPUC] One CC to Sri. P Narahari Babu Advocate [OPUC] Two CCs to GP for Home, High Court of Andhra Pradesh [OUT] Two CCs to GP for Registration and Stamps, High Court of Andhra Pradesh [OUT] I Three CD Copies 2. 3. 4. 5. GSC <9 HIGH COURT DATED:30/06/2025 ORDER WP NO. 17322 OF 2022 I 21 AUG 2025 3 ^ . Current Section DISMISSING THE WP AS WITHDRAWN WITHOUT COSTS