Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
- 1 -
NC: 2025:KHC:5456 WP No. 27083 of 2019
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 6TH DAY OF FEBRUARY, 2025 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE JYOTI MULIMANI WRIT PETITION NO. 27083 OF 2019 (GM-FF) BETWEEN:
SRI. B.M.AEKORAMASWAMY AGED ABOUT 88 YEARS, S/O LATE C.B.MARULAPPA, RESIDENT OF AJJAMPURA, TOWN AND TALUK, CHICKMAGALUR DISTRICT. …PETITIONER (BY SRI.H.B.RUDRESH., ADVOCATE [ABSENT])
AND:
1.
UNION OF INDIA, MINISTRY OF HOME AFFAIRS, FREEDOM FIGHTER DIVISION, 2ND FLOOR, NEW DELHI CITY CENTRE-II, PARLIAMENT STREET, NEW DELHI - 110 011.
BY ITS SECRETARY.
2.
STATE OF KARNATAKA REPRESENTED BY ITS PRINCIPAL SECRETARY, DPAR (AR), POLITICAL DIVISION-I, M.S.BUILDING, BANGALORE - 560 001. …RESPONDENTS (BY SRI. SHANTHI BHUSHAN.H., DSGI FOR R1;
SRI. MAHANTESH SHETTAR., AGA R2)
Digitally signed by PREMCHANDRA M R Location: High Court of Karnataka
- 2 -
NC: 2025:KHC:5456 WP No. 27083 of 2019
THIS WRIT PETITION IS FILED UNDER ARTICLES 226 AND 227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA, SEEKING CERTAIN RELIEFS.
THIS WRIT PETITION IS LISTED FOR PRELIMINARY HEARING IN 'B' GROUP, THIS DAY, AN ORDER IS MADE AS UNDER:
ORAL ORDER
When the case is called, the petitioner is not represented. When the case is listed and called out, the advocate must be present. The absence may affect the case. As could be seen from the daily order sheet, the petition was listed on 30.10.2023, on that day, there was no representation on behalf of the petitioner. Hence, it was ordered to be listed after one week.
The petition is listed today. The petition is filed in the year 2019. Now we are in the month of February 2025. It's pending for almost six years. As already noted above, when the case is called, the petitioner is not represented. It appears that the petitioner is not interested in prosecuting the petition. Hence, the Writ Petition is dismissed for non-prosecution. Sd/- (JYOTI MULIMANI) JUDGE MRP List No.: 2 Sl No.: 26