Research › Search › Judgment

Allahabad High Court · body

2025 DAILYLAW 20830 (ALL)

SUMAN MAURYA v. STATE OF U.P. AND ANOTHER

NA529/280/2025 · 2025-04-22

Nalin Kumar Srivastava

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

Neutral Citation No. - 2025:AHC:61281 Court No. - 80 Case :- APPLICATION U/S 529 BNSS No. - 280 of 2025 Applicant :- Suman Maurya Opposite Party :- State of U.P. and Another Counsel for Applicant :- Ajeet Kumar Srivastava,Navin Pandey Counsel for Opposite Party :- G.A. Hon'ble Nalin Kumar Srivastava,J. 1. This application under Section 529 BNSS has been filed with a prayer to direct the court concerned to decide the Case No. 9090 of 2017, under Sections 18, 9, 20 & 22 Protection of Women from Domestic Violence Act, Police Station Sigramau, District- Jaunpur pending in the Court of Additional Chief Magistrate-Vth, Jaunpur expeditiously within stipulated period. 2. Heard learned counsel for the applicant as well as learned A.G.A. for the State. 3. It is submitted by the learned counsel for the applicant that the applicant is the wife of opposite party no.2 and present case is pending since 2017. It is also submitted that the opposite party no.2 are not cooperating with the Court concerned and are adopting delaying tactics in disposal of the said case and only dates are being fixed in the matter. Applicant is a lady and and she has no means for her livelihood. She is not in a position to attend the Court for the pairvi of the case on each and every date. 4. Learned AGA opposed the prayer. 5. I have considered the submissions and perused the record. 6. Applicant is the wife of opposite party no.2 and she has a right for expeditious disposal of the case under the Domestic Violence Act, which is the object and mandate of the Act itself. 7. In the circumstances, the Court concerned is directed to decide the aforesaid case within three months from the date of production of certified copy of this order before it, if there is no legal impediment. It is further directed that no unnecessary adjournment will be sought/granted. 8. It is also made clear that the Court / Presiding Officer is not the only stake holder of the trial and disposal of a case, hence, besides the P.O. concerned, all the stake holders i.e. police and execution authorities, advocates, parties to the case, staff etc. are also made bound by this order and it will be their responsibility also to assist the Court in every manner for the expeditious disposal of this case. 9. With the above observations, the application stands disposed of. Order Date :- 23.4.2025//Fhd Digitally signed by :- FAHAD NIYAZ High Court of Judicature at Allahabad