[2025:RJ-JP:30499-DB] HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR D.B. Civil Contempt Petition No. 627/2025 Surendra Kumar Jain S/o Late Shri Tejbahadur Singh, Aged About 75 Years, R/o B 290, Flatnumber 201 Second Manjil, Gurunanakpura Tilaknagar Jaipur Rajasthan. ----Petitioner Versus 1. State Of Rajasthan, Through Chief Secretary, Home Department, Secretariat, Jaipur 2. Vibha Sharma, Additional Judicial Magistrate S. No. 8, Jaipur, Mahanagar Second. ----Respondents Connected With D.B. Civil Contempt Petition No. 771/2025 Surendra Kumar Jain S/o Late Shri Tej Bahadur Singh, Aged About 75 Years, Resident Of B 290 Flat Number 201, Gurunanakpura Tilak Nagar Jaipur. ----Petitioner Versus 1. State Of Rajasthan, Through Chief Secretary Home Department Govt. Secretariat Jaipur. 2. Lav Prajapati, Chief Judicial Magistrate Serial Number 4 Jaipur Mahanagar Second, Jaipur. ----Respondents For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Surendra Kumar Jain, Petitioner present in person For Respondent(s) : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SANJEEV PRAKASH SHARMA HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SANJEET PUROHIT Order 07/08/2025 D.B. Civil Contempt Petition No. 771/2025 1. The petitioner is aggrieved by the order dated 30.06.2025 passed by the Court of learned Additional Chief Judicial Magistrate, No.4, Jaipur Metropolitan-II, Jaipur. [2025:RJ-JP:30499-DB] (2 of 3) [CCP-627/2025] 2. No case for contempt is made out as the criminal case registered against the petitioner through F.I.R. No.276/2022, Police Station Sadar, Distt. Jaipur, has been closed by the learned Additional Chief Judicial Magistrate, No.4, Jaipur Metropolitan-II, Jaipur, while accepting the Final Report No.135/2022 vide order dated 30.06.2025. 3. It appears that the petitioner is still aggrieved of the wrongful prosecution initiated against him. Therefore, he may take up appropriate remedy available under the law for wrongful criminal prosecution initiated vide aforesaid F.I.R., for which he will always free to take up proceedings as available under the B.N.S.S. 4. In view of the above, the instant contempt petition filed by the petitioner on the ground that fair and appropriate investigation of the F.I.R. was not done, is found to be baseless and the same is hereby dismissed. 5. Pending application(s), if any, stands disposed of. 6. Notice(s), if any, stands discharged. D.B. Civil Contempt Petition No. 627/2025 1. The present petitioner is also aggrieved by the order dated 03.02.2025 passed by the Court of learned Additional Judicial Magistrate, No.8, Jaipur Metropolitan-II, Jaipur, whereby the Final Report filed in the matter was accepted instead of protest petition filed by the petitioner. 2. The impugned order dated 03.02.2025 can be assailed by way of a revision petition before the concerned Revisional Court [2025:RJ-JP:30499-DB] (3 of 3) [CCP-627/2025] afresh, even though, a revision petition had been filed earlier and the matter had been remanded. 3. While granting liberty to the petitioner to file a revision petition, the present contempt proceedings are closed. 4. The instant contempt petition is disposed of accordingly. 5. Pending application(s), if any, also stands disposed of. 6. Notice(s), if any, stands discharged. (SANJEET PUROHIT),J (SANJEEV PRAKASH SHARMA),J SAHIL SONI /59-60