KARUNA AGARWAL v. UTTARAKHAND TRANSPORT CORPOATION AT DEHRADUN
WPSS/144/2025 · 2025-02-14
Rakesh Thapliyal
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 2082 (UTT) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 2082 (UTT) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
2025:UHC:1035 SL. No. Date Office Notes, reports, orders or proceedings or directions and Registrar’s
order with Signatures COURT’S OR JUDGE’S ORDERS
WPSS No.144 of 2025 Hon’ble Rakesh Thapliyal, J.
1. Mr. Akshay Latwal, learned counsel for the petitioner.
2. Mr. N.S. Pundir, learned Dy.A.G. for the State.
3. The petitioner is praying for the following relief(s):
“i) Issue a writ, order or direction in the nature of mandamus directing the respondent department to pay the amount i.e. Rs. 3,26,925/- which was recovered from the gratuity amount of the petitioner’s husband. ii) To pass any other writ, order or direction, which this Hon’ble Court may deem fit and proper in the facts and circumstances of the case.”
4.
Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the issue, as raised in the present petition, is squarely covered by the judgment rendered by the Division Bench passed in bunch of Special Appeal leading one Special Appeal No. 245 of 2022, “Managing Director Uttarakhand Transport Corporation at Dehradun versus Ashok Kumar Saxena, decided on
04.04.2024.
5. Mr. N.S. Pundir, learned Dy.A.G. for the State, fairly submits that the issue as raised in this petition is squarely covered by the said judgment.
6. In view of the statement as given above, the present writ petition is disposed of in terms of the judgment rendered by the Division Bench passed in bunch of
2025:UHC:1035 Special Appeal leading one Special Appeal No. 245 of 2022, “Managing Director Uttarakhand Transport Corporation at Dehradun versus Ashok Kumar Saxena, decided on 04.04.2024.
(Rakesh Thapliyal, J.) 14.02.2025 R.Bisht