Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Chhattisgarh · body

2025 DAILYLAW 20816 (CHH)

UMESH KUMAR v. SMT. PUSHPA YADAV

CRR/585/2023 · 2025-06-22

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

1 2025:CGHC:27062 NAFR HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR CRR No. 585 of 2023 Umesh Kumar Son Of Shri Ramkeshwar Yadav, Aged About 30 Years R/o. Village - Manpur, Post - Laxamgarh, Tahsil - Udaypur, District Sar- guja, Civil And Revenue District Sarguja Chhattisgarh. ... Petitioner versus Smt. Pushpa Yadav D/o. Shri Gopal Ram Yadav, Aged About 24 Years R/o. Village - Sonpur, P.S. Surajpur, Tahsil Ramanujnagar, District Surajpur Chhattisgarh. ... Respondent For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Manoj Kumar Sinha, Advocate. For Respondent(s) : Mr. Sajal Kumar Gupta, Advocate. Hon'ble Mr. Ramesh Sinha, Chief Justice Order on Board 23/06 /202 5 1. Heard Mr. Manoj Kumar Sinha, learned counsel for the petitioner. Also heard Mr. Sajal Kumar Gupta,, learned counsel for respondent. 2. The present petition has been filed by the petitioner seeking following relief: “It is therefore prayed that the Hon'ble Court be pleased to call for the records of the Misc. Cr. RAHUL DEWANGAN Digitally signed by RAHUL DEWANGAN 2 Case.No.133/2021 and Cri. MJC No. 156/2022 and after its perusal allow this Revision and set aside the impugned order dated 19.09.2022 passed in the case of (Smt. Pushpa Yadav and Vs Umesh Kumar) by the Family Court, Surajpur, in the interest of justice.” 3. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the matter has become infructuous as the matter has been amicably settled between the parties. 4. In view of the submission made by learned counsel for the petitioner, the present petition is dismissed as having become infructuous. Sd/- (Ramesh Sinha) Chief Justice Rahul Dewangan