Research › Search › Judgment

Madras High Court · body

2025 DAILYLAW 208151 (MAD)

Premkumar v. The State of Tamilnadu Rep.by,

CRL OP(MD)/20772/2025 · 2025-11-24

Sunder Mohan

Transfer Petitionbody2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

CRL OP(MD). No.20772 of 2025 BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT Dated : 24.11.2025 CORAM THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SUNDER MOHAN Crl.O.P(MD). No.20772 of 2025 Premkumar, ... Petitioner Vs. 1. The State of Tamilnadu Rep. By Inspector of Police, AWPS Puliyangudi Police Station, Tenkasi District Cr.No.27/2025. 2. Arulmozhi, ... Respondents PRAYER :- This petition is filed under section 528 BNSS, to quash the FIR in Crime No.27 of 2025 dated 07.09.2025 pending on the file of the 1st respondent police. For Petitioner : Mr.K.Karansingh, For Respondents : Mr.K.Sanjai Gandhi, Government Advocate (Crl.Side) for R1 : Mr.J.Krishna Kannan for R2 1/5 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis CRL OP(MD). No.20772 of 2025 ORDER The petitioner seeks to quash the impugned FIR registered for the alleged offences under Sections 69 and 251 (2) BNS. 2. The gist of the allegation is that the petitioner and the defacto complainant had a love affair; that on the promise of marriage, he had sexual intercourse with the defacto complainant and thereafter, refused to marry her and thus committed the aforesaid offences. 3. Admittedly, the petitioner and the second respondent are close relatives and they have now entered into a compromise and decided to give a quietus to the entire dispute. It is stated that the second respondent now married the petitioner and living happily with the petitioner. The defacto complainant is now aged about 25 years. The parties have filed a joint compromise memo dated 19.11.2025. 4. The petitioner and the second respondent are present before this Court in person. They are identified by Ms.B.Sethulakshmi, WHC-723, 2/5 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis CRL OP(MD). No.20772 of 2025 AWPS, Puliyangudi Police Station, Tenkasi District. All the parties confirmed the compromise arrived at between them. 5. Considering the nature of the allegation, the relationship and the compromise arrived at between the parties, this Court is of the view that no useful purpose would be served by keeping the impugned FIR pending investigation. Accordingly, the impugned FIR in Crime No.27 of 2025 is quashed and the Criminal Original Petition stands allowed. The joint compromise memo dated 19.11.2025, shall form part and parcel of the order. The petitioner shall pay a sum of Rs.10,000/- (Rupees Ten Thousand only) as costs to the Mediation and Conciliation Centre attached to this Bench and file a photocopy of the receipt along with a memo reporting compliance in the Registry. 24.11.2025 Index: Yes/ No Neutral Citation: Yes / No Speaking Order / Non-Speaking Order LS 3/5 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis CRL OP(MD). No.20772 of 2025 TO 1. The Inspector of Police, AWPS Puliyangudi Police Station, Tenkasi District. 2. The Additional Public Prosecutor, Madurai Bench of Madras High Court, Madurai. 3.The Officer in-charge, Mediation and Conciliation Centre Madurai Bench of Madras High Court, Madurai. 4/5 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis CRL OP(MD). No.20772 of 2025 SUNDER MOHAN,J. LS CRL OP(MD) No.20772 of 2025 24.11.2025 5/5 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis