{1} CA 4913 OF 2021 & ORS IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY BENCH AT AURANGABAD 917 CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 4913 OF 2021 IN FAST/18661/2019 BHIM MASNAJI NARLE VERSUS THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND ORS ... Advocate for Applicant : Mr.R. P. Adgaonkar AGP for Respondent nos.1 & 2 : Mrs.D.S.Jape …. AND 918 CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 4914 OF 2021 IN FAST/19135/2019 DIGAMBER VITHALRAO PATIL VERSUS THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND ORS ... Advocate for Applicant : Mr.R. P. Adgaonkar AGP for Respondents: Mr.N.D.Batule …. AND 919 CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 5151 OF 2021 IN FAST/18612/2019 MAROTI MALGONDA GANGAJI VERSUS THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND ORS ... Advocate for Applicant : Mr. R.P. Adgaonkar AGP for Respondents: Mr.S.S.Dande …. AND 921 CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 12041 OF 2021 IN FAST/19133/2019 DHANAJI DEVRAO BIRADAR VERSUS THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND ORS 2025:BHC-AUG:17922 {2} CA 4913 OF 2021 & ORS ... Advocate for Applicant : Mr. R.P. Adgaonkar AGP for Respondent nos.1 & 2 : Mr.S.M.Ganachari …. AND 922 CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 12129 OF 2021 IN FAST/19154/2019 SANTOSH MURLIDHAR VERSUS THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND ORS ... Advocate for Applicant : Mr. R.P. Adgaonkar AGP for Respondent nos.1 & 2 : Mrs.D.S.Jape …. AND 926 CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 1693 OF 2022 IN FAST/20050/2019 YADAV NIVRUTTI BIRADAR VERSUS THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND ORS ... Advocate for Applicant : Mr.R.P. Adgaonkar AGP for Respondent nos.1 & 2 : Mr.S.M.Ganachari …. AND 927 CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 2155 OF 2022 IN FAST/18693/2019 NAGMANI SHANKARAPPA MATIPATI VERSUS THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND ORS ... Advocate for Applicant : Mr.R.P. Adgaonkar AGP for Respondent nos.1 & 2 : Mrs.D.S.Jape …. AND 928 CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 2172 OF 2022 IN FAST/19407/2019 GOVIND LALU SURYAWANSHI {3} CA 4913 OF 2021 & ORS VERSUS THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND ORS ... Advocate for Applicant : Mr. R.P. Adgaonkar AGP for Respondent nos.1 & 2 : Mr.N.D.Batule …. CORAM : ABHAY S. WAGHWASE, J. DATE : 09 JULY, 2025 PER COURT :- 1. In spite of several opportunities, none appeared for respondent no.3 on any of the dates on which matters were kept. Therefore, matters were taken up for hearing exparte. 2. Heard. 3. These applications are filed by the claimants for condonation of delay caused in filing first appeal against the judgment and order passed by the Reference Court in the land acquisition references. 4. Learned AGP opposed the applications stating that delay is not properly explained. Hence, applications may be rejected. 5. For the reasons stated in the applications, delay is required to {4} CA 4913 OF 2021 & ORS be condoned. Accordingly, applications are allowed. Delay is condoned on the condition that the applicants shall not be entitled for the interest for the period of delay. 6. Accordingly, applications are disposed of. 7. Appeals be registered. On registration of appeals, issue notice to the respondents, returnable within four weeks thereafter. Learned AGP waives service of notice for respondents-State. ( ABHAY S. WAGHWASE ) JUDGE SPT