Dwarampudi Surareddi @ Reddy Babu v. Gadiraju Suryanarayana Raju
AS/302/2010 · 2025-06-15
B V L N Chakravarthi
Original Suitbody2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 20804 (AP) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 20804 (AP) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
F IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI MONDAY, THE SIXTEENTH DAY OF JUNE TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE B.V.L.N.CHAKRAVARTHI APPEAL SUIT NO: 302 OF 2010 Appeal filed under section 96 of C.P.C., against the judgment and decree in O.S.No. 508 of 2006, dated 11-11-2009 on the file of the Court of the III Additional Senior Civil Judge, Kakinada. Between: Dwarampudi Surareddi @ Reddy Babu, S/o. Subbareddy, aged about 71 years, R/o. D.No. 2-26-23, Maithili Street, Srinagar, Kakinada, East Godavari District. ...Appellant/Plaintiff AND Gadiraju Suryanarayana Raju, S/o. Somaraju, Aged about 56 years, Opp; Venkateswaraswamy Temple, Naupada, Santha Bommadi Mandalam, Srikakulam District. ...Respondent/Defendant Counsel for the Appellant: Smt. R Durga Latha Sri representing Sri E VV S Ravi Kumar Counsel for the Respondent: Sri Bolla Venkata Rama Rao The Court made the following:
! i APHC010293502010 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) MONDAY, THE SIXTEENTH DAY OF JUNE TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE [3368] PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE B V L N CHAKRAVARTHI APPEAL SUIT NO: 302 of 2010 \ Between: Dwarampudi Surareddi @ Reddy Babu ...APPELLANT AND Gadiraju Suryanarayana Raju ...RESPONDENT Counsel for the Appellant:
TEWS RAVI KUMAR Counsel for the Respondent:
1. BOLLA VENKATA RAMA RAO The Court made the following Judgment: Smt.R.Durga Latha Sri, learned counsel representing Sri E.V.V.S.Ravi Kumar, learned counsel for the appellant would submit that the sole appellant is no more and accordingly, a Memo dated 18.12.2024 was filed to that effect. Learned counsel would further submit that legal representatives of the deceased sole appellant is not coming forward to prosecute the case and hence, necessary orders may be rendered in this appeal.
r 2
2.
Learned counsel for respondent is in attendance.
3. In that view of the matter, this Appeal Suit is dismissed as abated. No order as to costs. Interlocutory applications, if any, pending shall stand closed.
Sd/- M. RAMESH BABU DEPUTY REGISTRAR Tf^^FFICER //TRUE COPY// SEC To The III Additional Civil Judge (Senior Division); Kakinada, East Godavari District.
2. One CC to Sri E V V S Ravi Kumar, Advocate [OPUC]
3. One CC to Sri Bolfa Venkata Rama Rao, Advocate [OPUC]
4. Two CD Copies ' ^ ^ 1 SAM ' C RAM
\ *''s f HIGH COURT DATED:16/06/2025
JUDGMENT AS.No.302 of 2010 SS: if m SEP 2025 S^^sj^rrentSoc im DISMISSING THE APPEAL SUIT AS ABATED WITHOUT COSTS